this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023

31 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers

57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

31

Uh, so, if I wanted better odds to survive ecological collapse, where would I move to and what would I do? Mostly hypothetical because I'll probably just stay put and bite the bullet lol. (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by iie@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] logflume@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An island country like New Zealand seems like a pretty ass location to weather rising sea levels and climate change but what do I know.

My guess would be something like Saskatchewan or Manitoba might be pretty nice places to live with potable water. From what I hear real estate there is also booming, so I'm not the only one thinking that.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

New Zealand is volcanic with a lot of elevation, so you're not drowning anytime soon.