this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
380 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59116 readers
3713 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Authors using a new tool to search a list of 183,000 books used to train AI are furious to find their works on the list.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The creation of the AI model is transformative. The AI's model does not contain a literal copy of the copyrighted work.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, but the training data does contain a copy. And making a model is not criticising, commenting upon, or creating a parody of it.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That list is not exclusive, it's just a list of examples of fair use.

The training data is not distributed with the AI model.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it's just a list of examples of fair use.

Yes, it's a list of quite similar ways of commenting upon a work. Please explain how training an LLM is like any of those things, and thus, how Fair use would apply.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying that training an LLM is like any of those things. I'm saying it doesn't have to be like those things in order for it to still be fair use.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pay for every bit of information you've read and regurgitated on exams.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AI is not human and should not be treated like a human

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not. The humans that trained it (assumably) purchased the material used to train it. What's the problem?

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The use of the material to create a commercial product as well as the reality being that the humans training it never buy the data on an individual level.