this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
651 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

59472 readers
4837 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta sparks privacy fears after unveiling $299 Smart Glasses with hidden cameras: ‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’::These stylish shades may look like a regular pair of Ray-Ban Wayfarers, but they're actually Meta's new Smart Glasses, complete with two tiny cameras and speakers implanted in the arms. The wearable tech was unveiled by Mark Zuckerberg Wednesday at the 2023 Meta Connect conference in Menlo Park, California, sparking a frenzy online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Hidden cameras? They've got big ol fuckin cameras on them and apparently a red LED that lights up when in use lol. It'd be easier to secretly film someone by pretending you're texting on your phone. More ragebait.

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You seriously think it wouldn't be trivial to disable the LED?

And by the time you notice the LED you've already been filmed.

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

It would be trivial to just buy spy cameras already built for spying. The tech already exists

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Buddy, have you been on Aliexpress recently? It's trivial to wire tiny cameras all over your body if you really wanted.

Not that it matters, I can point an 8K cinema camera at you in public, and you don't legally get a say.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not that it matters, I can point an 8K cinema camera at you in public, and you don’t legally get a say.

This isn't the case everywhere. Some places have laws with likeness rights if you try to use the footage in commercial productions.

Two-party consent states also attach legal consequences to secret voice recordings.

This is strictly legally speaking. People can and do violate the law.

[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

New art project!

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The LED detects when it is blocked and the device refuses to function until it is unblocked. So no, working around that won't be trivial, at least until somebody has found a workaround.

If Meta wanted to be really throughout with this, they could also keep record of how often there is an issue with the LED and brick the device and close your account if they detect tempering. The whole "trivial to disable" doesn't fly in a world of closed ecosystem, locked down hardware and accounts requiring a real ID.

Also you can get spy cameras for $5 from Aliexpress anyway, so why even bother hacking this. Snapchat has some video recording glasses too if one needs an alternative.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago

The led is a simple transistor that happens to glow, just replace it

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Again you can record already without any led while "reading your messages" with your phone. Like I feel they did the expected and necessary.

Plus is not like there isn't already available pens, USB chargers, watches or whatever they can come up secret cameras, like if the intention was to secretly record somebody they wouldn't go with this ones disabling the led.... plenty of better less suspicious alternatives.

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ray ban have had them for years. I hate meta but it's not just them.

[–] tehmics@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago

To be fair that was also a Facebook partnership. This is less news and more product revision

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago

It took me a 3 second google search to find that it doesn't work with the LED covered.

By the time you notice someone's phone is out you've already been filmed. That's status quo these days, it isn't any creepier than every single person walking around with a camera in their pocket.

[–] orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine it wouldn't take long until someone finds a way to disable that LED.

[–] livedeified@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

looks like a sharpie would do the trick

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't work while covered, there's a sensor in the light

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spoof the measured sensor value

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Right, trivial. Or just buy a tiny $4 spy camera off AliExpress lol