this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
216 points (92.9% liked)

Games

16742 readers
882 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's not a standard xbox controller. There's a gyro with several ways to handle it, including flick, which does take a little time to get used to, but works really well as a mouse substitution for such an environment. Some people are just that good with a thumbstick as well and can easily enjoy casual gamemodes.

Steam Deck is a capable beast, even for a game like Counter-Strike.

[–] DopamineDaydreams@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The same was said about the steam controller, but in the end it was still shit compared to a mouse. It's just not feasible in a game as competitive as csgo.

[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not for everyone, but calling it shit just because it doesn't work easily for your liking is
a bit much since it's still usable to some. I beat plethora of shooters on gyro and it wasn't that much harder than playing on mouse once I got used to it.

[–] forgotaboutlaye@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Controllers in general are also extremely accessible, and expandable for those that might struggle using a tradtional mouse and keyboard.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

CS:GO is dead, though, and neither of the popular and beloved entries to the series was ever solely focused on the competitive scene - the community and the casual fun also matter in the world of Counter-Strike, and that's one of its parts that can be enjoyed on a controller just fine. Of course I don't expect to be able to perform just as well or better than the M+K players when playing on a controller, regardless of its gyro capabilities, especially in the competitive modes. Counter-Strike is just much more than just a competitive game.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eh, people always say this yet data shows it’s not true. Many competitive games have had controller vs m+k and found no discernible advantage. Halo for one, gears of war is another I remember.

I play with an elite controller and I have had zero problem winning and going mvp against m+k players in any game I’ve played. I play PUBG where m+k use is rampant and I still maintain a 30-40% win rate in squads, often in 2 man squads.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] li10@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d say in this instance there’s a massive difference between CS and OW tbh.

I can believe that you could do well and enjoy OW on controller vs M+K, as the game gives you a lot of tools that reduce the need for good aim.

In CS, I just can’t see how you’d work around that though. To each their own, but I don’t see how CS could ever be enjoyable on controller vs K+M.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] pec@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

At its core, CS is a competitive shooter. Having casual maps and modes is fun but the game should not cater to this play mode. If valve tries to make it casual friendly they will disappoint the competitive players and will not be able to compete with other casual shooters.

Basically I don't want then to cater too much to the casual scene

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

This isn't what's happening, though? What are you on about?

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Valve caters more to the casual scene than most companies do by allowing custom servers and an in game custom server browser.

How much more casual can it get?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Being on a console, on the couch.

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

CSGO was made entirely for the purpose of being a console game, no body played it on console so they abandoned it

You are perfectly capable of setting on the couch at any time. The computer does not stop this. You are actively making the decision to not sit on a couch, as an adult you're allowed to do this.