this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
319 points (93.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32495 readers
706 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 87 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry, I'm gonna be that person.

*What. It should say What it feels like.

[–] soeren@iusearchlinux.fyi 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Thanks English is not my native language.

[–] gbuttersnaps@programming.dev 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just for the sake of information, the two common ways to put this in English are "How it feels" and "What it feels like". The former phrase is just descriptive, so it doesn't need the "like" at the end. The latter phrase is comparative to another thing, so it needs the like. Also this is something that native speakers mix up all the time, so don't worry too much; your English is great!

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the explanation.

[–] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Der Name Sören ist definitiv ein Hinweis darauf :D

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Technology we could never dream of on Reddit

[–] OhTheMoose@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Or "How it feels"

I feel like there's been a gradual increase in people saying things like this ("would of" instead of "would've", "apart" instead of "a part", etc)

[–] glorious_albus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess it's just the increase in the ease of availability of internet.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

More reading social media posts than reading books, probably. If one doesn't make the connection between the sounds and the proper written word, then you might be more likely to make mistakes like "would of" instead of "would've" (which is my pet peeve, incidentally)

[–] OhTheMoose@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That and the unfortunate increasing failure of the education system.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also the fact that language is not set in stone and continues to evolve....

[–] OhTheMoose@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm tired of seeing that argument to validate incorrect usage of words that already exist. Words mean things. People using a language incorrectly don't get to just decide that the words they're using mean something else now because that's how they meant it. That's not "growing and evolving", it's just using the language incorrectly and being too stubborn to admit a fault in themself and instead try to change the language to fit their lack of education about the language and its usage.

The words "could", "should", or "would" followed by the word "of" is completely nonsensical and meaningless. It is a misunderstanding/misinterpretation of "could've", "would've", or "should've" being heard audibly because they sound similar. "Apart" literally means the opposite of "a part", and, again, comes from a misunderstanding from hearing the word spoken rather than seeing it written down because it sounds the same.

A perfect example of language evolving is the word "another". It literally is the words "an" and "other" pushed together to form a single word and has the exact same meaning as that. Another example is the word "bosun". It literally means "boatswain", and comes from the word being shortened down in spoken communication, but is a completely made up word and has no prior meaning.

Do not confuse incorrect usage of the language as growth and change.

I'm sorry for coming off as an ass, I literally did not sleep last night and I'm very tired.