this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

31 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Willie@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Make note about what? This is a good thing. They went through the efforts to acquire the rights for the training data, and people might have even been paid for the original work.

It's not like this stops someone from paying artists or photographers to make art or photos for their training data, or creating some sort of group where contributors actively give the rights to their own artwork or photos for a model, like some sort of open source project kind of thing, people love that kind of stuff! You're just acting like this is some awful thing, when it's completely fine, and the way it should be.

[–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To me the obvious answer would be to pay people a small amount per photo for pictures of various things and then use that as training data.

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's expensive and companies would rather not pay while the law is unclear on using copywrited images in a training set

[–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The thing is that for medium to large companies it's probably less expensive to pay people a nominal fee for pictures than it would be to risk being sued by, say, Disney, Nintendo, WWE or Games Workshop (to use some famously litigious companies).

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I hope that's the direction we head that way artists are appropriately compensated for their work. We'll see entire libraries/brokers pop up that grant LLM makers access to work for a fee.