this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
750 points (90.3% liked)

Games

16651 readers
874 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Epic is chasing that because they really want what Valve has, though no doubt they plan to speedrun the enshittification process as soon as they think it safe.

Like what Steam did with Greenlight and the plague of early access asset flips that clogged its home page for years?

[–] stillwater@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Greenlight had nothing to do with selling out the end user experience to cash out on providing value and leaving the service near unusable, unless you have some kind of compulsion where you have to buy everything on Steam.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The trading card feature created an ecosystem allowing cheap asset flips to quickly make the threshold. And make their money back, creating a positive feedback loop.

Steam allowed its store to be flooded with these games at the expense of its customers because it got it's cut.

[–] pkpenguin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've never understood this complaint because it takes no effort at all to just ignore these games

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Do you think they wanted it to be abused? It's pretty obvious they didn't like the way it went which is why they got rid of it...