this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
750 points (90.3% liked)

Games

16961 readers
208 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only thing Valve has done with Steam that apparently is anti-competitive, is actually having a decent product with good features and no one else is capable of actually delivering parity with it to be a viable competitor.

A natural monopoly is a far cry from one built through anti-competitive practices, and easily toppled by competent competitors.

Perhaps if Valve's competition was competent, there would be better options.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

True. But Google became the number one search engine by creating a better product and basically got a natural monopoly. And now look what kind of monster the company has become.

Just because Steam is a good store today doesn’t mean it will stay that way in the future. Therefore I rather not see Steam be the only game store left in the pc gaming space.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But Epic is a shitty store today. I'm not going to use it out of fear the Steam might become a shitty store tomorrow.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s fine, neither do I. Because as a customer we have a choice. But we only have that choice if devs make their games available on all stores.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Epic has in the past declined hosting games that don't agree to exclusivity, so it's not always the dev's choice.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then get mad at the weak-ass competition. Start a fire under their asses to make something that is actually just as good, if not better.

Punishing the one good product for being good is just gonna lead to there being no good products and only shitty ones just as much as your slippery-slope scenario. 🤦‍♂️

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well no. Google used to steal results from other search engines initially.v And then suppressed search results for competing products for at least the last 20 years.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

And Valve does the same thing by delisting competitors games if they undercut the price on steam. But of course that somehow doesn't count when you're a cultist shilling for a billion dollar company.