this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
307 points (93.2% liked)

Memes

45680 readers
569 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quazar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Eh, no. Mathematics is an hallucination of ours we are trying to desperately map onto reality. I say this as a mathematician. When you look out into our reality, you know what we see? A curved universe. There is nothing in our reality that is truely STRAIGHT.

YET, we creatures came up with such an natural thing as a straight line. Straight lines are a uniquely human hallucination. Its the logic we use to make sense of the world, but its a Rorschach test of our own making. You are attaching meaning to it because thats what our brains do. generate meaning out of chaos.

I need to look no further than pi, which is a number that represents our feeble attempts to push the round universe into our square heads. Its trying to represent the curved universe as a straight line (and visavers) - and reality said : LOL, NOPE!! YOU get a number that is more illusive than the irrationals. A never ending non patterned number.

All of nature is not based on mathematics. Mathematics is the language we use to describe nature. Thats like saying the Grand Canyon is BASED on book describing the Grand Canyon.

1.) No its not. Its our language, not nature's.

2.) To a degree, yes. But thats because our brains are pattern seeking and pattern generating machines - not because nature follows a system WE made up.

3.) Did I mention Pi yet

Here

https://i.imgur.com/a5ueCi5.jpg

THIS is a graph of a discovery that I made in number theory. Does it look like it has a pattern to you? I think this is the most beautiful thing I've ever seen, because IT MAKES NO SENSE. which means, we still have a lot to discover and learn

[–] SwallowsDick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

draws a straight line

"Fuck you, God"

[–] quazar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I ❤️ this so much. Thank you 😁

[–] herrwoland@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Such a fascinating read, definitely changed my perception about mathematics and the world, I'm probably going to remember your view about the world time by time in the future. What makes your comment all the more interesting is that what I wrote was a quote from the movie "pi" which is about a mathematician. You've probably watched it but if you haven't I really think you should check it out.

[–] SwallowsDick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This could be a new modifiable copypasta

[–] Vupperware@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Such a fascinating read, definitely changed my perception about copypastas and the Fediverse. I'm probably going to remember your view about copypastas time by time in the future. What makes your comment all the more interesting is that what I wrote was a comment from the post which is about a maths. You've probably seen it but if you haven't I really think you should check it out.

[–] Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hey Quazar,

Great point and post. Any math + philosophy reddits you know of on Lemme?

[–] quazar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

reddits on Lemmy

Its going to be hard changing our vernacular

and no. If you know of any, lemme know

[–] Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah… I thought about it… and couldn’t be bothered to figure it out. Keep me posted though Quazar - maybe we can get one started.

[–] Vupperware@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Gimme dem philosophy subs!

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

"Eh, no". There are tons of actual patterns in mathematics, we didn't invent the "laws of physics" we just slapped a framework on top for better understanding. Math isn't a human invention, it's our interpretation of how things work, and at the base of it all there are laws that govern "how things work" (even if we haven't fully discovered all of them), it isn't just randomness that we're trying to apply patterns to.

Using your example of pi, calling it "chaos" is disingenuous, because it's a single constant that has a massive number of applications. That's not random or chaotic at all.