this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
116 points (82.2% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
116
Germany went from envy of the world to the worst-performing major developed economy. (apnews.com)
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
79 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] taladar@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A 2011 decision to shut down Germany’s remaining nuclear power plants has been questioned amid worries about electricity prices and shortages.

This is just a populist talking point. The nuclear power plants were at or very close to the end of their design lifespan, only covered a small single digit percentage of power usage and produced the most expensive electricity among all the power generation in the country.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

While it's true that this is a populist talking point, some minor quibbles:

  • In 2011, nuclear produced around 18% of German electricity. In 2022, that had decreased to 6% as Germany had been shutting off a few reactors each year. Essentially you're right though, Germany never rivaled France's 70% nuclear figure and if nuclear were supposed to have a future, Germany would have needed a lot of new reactors and that would have been cost-prohibitive.
  • Canada proves that you can extend the lifespan, given significant investment.
  • With nuclear, a lot of the money is spent upfront. By the time you make that calculation, the biggest chunk of the money is gone, as long as you don't build new reactors or perform massive do-overs like Canada did. Thus discussing the economics of already-built nuclear reactors is a bit pointless, unless you're purely doing it to learn from your mistakes (i.e. prevent building new reactors).