this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
391 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
1068 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Why would anyone want any of this fucking garbage anyway? Look at how the fuck boy runs twitter, you want that in your brain???

"Pay me or I turn you off, lol"

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At least he's honest and we can trust him. Oh wait...

Along with claiming that no monkeys have died because of a Neuralink implant, Musk has said the startup “chose terminal mon[k]eys (close to death already)” as test subjects to “minimize risk to healthy monkeys.” However, Wired cites an anonymous former employee saying that is not true:

Shown a copy of Musk’s remarks on X about Neuralink’s animal subjects being “close to death already,” a former Neuralink employee alleges to WIRED the claim is “ridiculous” if not a “straight fabrication.” “We had these monkeys for a year or so before any surgery was performed,” they say. The ex-employee, who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation, says up to a year’s worth of behavioral training was necessary for the program, a time frame that would exempt subjects already close to death’s door.

[–] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

A brain implant could be a solution for people with brain damage or born deficits that help them regain lost abilities.

I would never have one implanted as a luxury gadget though.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I might get an implant from a responsible company

Musk is a lot of things, he is a liar scammer, an outright asshole, an incompetent idiot... but he's never been responsible.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's a "responsible company"? Any public company could become irresponsible overnight if and when the shareholders demand it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

For one, probably a company without public shareholders. For two, a company that runs under very strict government rules

[–] MetaShawn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Took the words right out of my mouth! 👍

[–] Aagje_D_Vogel@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would, but not in the early development phase.

[–] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't trust some billionaire with a direct interface into my neural abilities. I know Musk had no problems using his satilites to sabotage Ukraine's army to appease Putin.

[–] Aagje_D_Vogel@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

True, but if/once it gets mainstream and has matured enough, and proper regulations are in place, I bet it can be a nifty tool.