Sure am. I just can't wrap my head around the idea that someone giving someone directions would have zero part in the eventual accident when those directions were faulty.

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should keep trying, because that is the only logical conclusion.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think it's logical to say someone giving directions had no part in what happened? Zero part, had nothing to do it?

Right... Logical.

[–] ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having a part and being responsible are two very different things. You are moving the bar 🤣.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They obviously have responsibility for their part... 🤦‍♂️

You are moving the bar

You previously replied to me asking if they have no part and said "that is the only logical conclusion"... If you didn't get what I meant you should've probably mentioned this moving the bar then and not after you gave a silly answer to the question. Better look if nothing else.

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

haha what