this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
1170 points (98.8% liked)

Antiwork

8283 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I wonder if the ultra rich understand just how much genuine malice is directed at them.

People were cheering for the submarine to implode.

It really seems like the world is full of tinder, waiting for a spark.

[–] Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah. People get really pissed when they're REALLY hungry.

We're kept at a perfect balance, we can't afford top shelf stuff, but most people have enough to get by.

Sure, it feels like everyone is a medium-sized misadventure away from financial collapse, but still, we get by. We have Internet, shows to stream, cheap shitty fast food next door.
No one can be bothered to go outside to chop heads demanding to redistribute wealth.

Especially considering that half the population has been talked into believing that by pulling your boot straps you can get as rich as Elon Musk, and Trump is literally Jesus.

There's no revolution incoming, just occasional angry tweets.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Revolutions are most closely correlated with food insecurity, yes.

But in today's JIT economy, and the vulnerability of our supply chains, it's not hard to imagine a set of circumstances where suddenly a huge swath of the population suddenly not knowing where their next three meals are coming from.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point. COVID exposed the weakness of the JIT model, and then we all went "huh, that's a funny noise for an engine to make" and kept using JIT.

[–] llama@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

What does JIT really mean though in the context of consumer goods? There's plenty of stores stocked full of stuff that will be on the shelves until the food expires. Sure some stuff like TP got wiped out but nobody was buying the random brand of wild rice I like. Does that mean we should have more regional stores of specific items that move quickly instead of trucking it all from Bentonville?

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Climate change will push things at some point

Probably in our life time too

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

80% of Americans deal with precarity. Food precarity, rent precarity, job precarity, family precarity, health precarity.

So a lot of us are feeling the discontent.

But we lefties arent used to planning violent protest (say sabotage and mischief. We'd rather not actually kill anyone.)

One possibility is the right-wing doing some sparking. A group of militant extremist reactionaries might load up and massacre a venue to get the civil war started.

Or the government could pass some laws resulting in mass incarcerations of non-violent offenders (say abortion seekers or LGBT+). Once that starts turning into capital punishment of young women protests might turn into arson of police and state facilities. We saw a bit of this with Iran with the Mahsa Amini protests or in 2020 US with the George Floyd protests.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm unsure of the relevance of a gamepad

Nevertheless, the seeming absurdity is funny and I'm here for it

[–] FeeshyFish@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's how they controlled the sub. You can buy one if you want.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Ohhh of course, you're right, that's why it looked familiar!

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The choice of a game controller to steer the Titan was the least-sketchy and most-defensible design decision made in that case. As a tinkerer and maker myself, you want to invent the fewest number of new things when inventing a new thing. It just makes sense to focus on the central goal. The goal was build a sub (poorly it turns out), not invent a new way to translate button presses into motion. That’s a solved problem.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Disagree. The fact that he chose a cheap third party controller instead of sparing no expense and using something better tells me he probably cheaped out in other places too.

Apparently he did with the hull, using leftover material from NASA that was full of micro cracks.

As far as the controller, military uses Xbox controllers for quite a lot of stuff. I imagine those are hardened enough to not Stick Drift too unlike our shitty civilian ones. In fact just the fact that stick drift is a huge problem across the board with controllers made in the last decade I would definitely reconsider a gamepad solution unless it had some Hall Effect sticks at minimum. But I know this cuz I'm a gamer whereas to Mr. Billionaire, any controller is good just get the damn Great Value one off the shelf.

Also he used it wirelessly. Come on. I don't wanna trust Bluetooth underwater.

Too many rookie mistakes just with the gamepad. When I saw that photo of him with it the day they went missing I knew they were dead as fuck.

[–] billy_bollocks@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the folks in the USA trying to make the rich richer have also hung their hat on arming the country. Interesting logic

[–] llama@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

I mean that IS the point of don't tread on me.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I don't think they talk to average humans much so they don't have much idea.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I've worked for a lot of super rich people over the years in high-end construction. Most (not all) of them are deeply un-self-aware and have no idea how they are seen by regular people because it would never occur to them to ever think about it. The lives of most people are like some strange and exotic foreign country that they're vaguely aware of but that they have no real interest in. They're aware of poverty as a concept, but that's as far as it goes; it's not something they actually understand or have any desire to understand or even think about.

A lot of this, I think, is somewhat deliberate in that it allows them to ignore how unjust their hoarding of wealth and resources is.