this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
115 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raven@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You build a high speed rail endpoint somewhere, and development will happen there. That's what I always point out.

That's why dense populations are always on rivers, because you can transport things along them easily. Trains are the same more or less.

[–] panopticon@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

O fukk, a railway is a lot like a metallic river walter-breakdown

[–] Bay_of_Piggies@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's easier to build infrastructure before people are living there en masse.