488

The Pennsylvania Democrat recalled his time serving as a Hillary Clinton surrogate in 2016, even after he supported Bernie Sanders in the primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lmao that's adorable that you think that. You think I was excited about fuckin John Kerry? Get real. My candidate that year famously... yelled loudly... and it ended his entire political career.

You have no idea the amount of settling I was willing to accept to see Bush not get re-elected.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You SHOULD have been excited about John Kerry. And Hillary. And Biden.

Those are the candidates that actually have a shot at winning. I was happy to vote for Howard Dean, and Sander and yet I know enough to fall behind the candidate that actually has a shot at winning if the one I vote for doesn't get the nomination. Dean made the exact same mistake that Sanders did - he had the naivete to count on the Left and the youth vote to get him elected. And like we've seen countless times before, those people don't vote. All the comments and posts and messages and tweets by liberals online about how this person or that person should win, when it comes to election day they don't show up.

So with that losing strategy proven time and time again, why the fuck should Democrats go to the Left, when voters are clearly showing them that they want more centrist candidates?

The news media ripped Dean apart for having the gall to be emotional after his primary win, but nothing stopped his Base from following up his victory with supporting him in subsequent primaries. And yet they didn't. Because liberals don't WANT to win. They want to complain.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was very excited about Hillary and Biden. I volunteered for their campaigns. I'm a liberal. I love liberal candidates, in general

John Kerry is the political equivalent of plain vanilla ice cream. Sure it's ice cream. But it isn't anything to get worked up about.

My post is about how I will generally vote for people I don't necessarily like to be President if it means a liberal gets in. I'm not blindly loyal, but I'm sure as shit not allowing a Trump or Ramaswamy in over like, Sanders, if he'd won.

I hope our President in 28 is Buttigieg. Dude lights a fire in me. If he loses the primary, I will still almost certainly be voting for the Democrat, because insane felons dont win the Democrat primary, so I'm unlikely to have an ethical crisis over it. I'll take a full on Sanders progressive over any Republican these days.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Hillary is a fantastic government worker, policy nerd, etc. I wish the Presidency wasn’t such a popularity contest because she’s the kind of person that can get things done. Same really goes for Kerry. Both fantastic Secretary of States.

[-] IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Remember when Gore ran and he couldnt find any way that he and Bush were different? And how his wife was a christofascist who led a censorship campaign?

That was great.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Remember when fuck off?

[-] IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Putin? Don't you usually get your poorly paid troll army to do this, or have you sent them all to die in Ukraine?

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
488 points (93.0% liked)

politics

18956 readers
3882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS