Privacy

32013 readers

1101 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Is Skiff trustworthy? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been using skiff. com for sometime, as they claim to be a fully privacy preserving app suite like GApps or proton. One thing I like is they provide 10GB storage even for free accounts, where proton eventhough much bigger provides only 500MB.

But that got me wondering... Are they trustworthy as proton? Is there a chanve they end up being a honeypot? Does data actually gets encrypted before sending to the servers in a trustworthy way?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fbsz@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Skiff licensed all of it's apps it at CC-BY-NC-4, why not change it for GPL 3.0 to make it a real free and open source software that respects user's freedom and mandates the fork to be free and open source. There's a difference between free software, open source and source available!

[–] obosob@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I presume the reason they didn't use GPL3 is because they wanted the attribution and non-commercial clauses offered by CC-BY-NC.

Not suggesting that they should not prefer to drop those clauses in favour of a copyleft free software licence. but you asked "why not" and losing those clauses is clearly an obvious candidate for why they might not want to.

[–] fbsz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A software using CC-BY-NC-4 is not a good option, as it was made for media. If skiff markets itself as open source, it should respect the guidelines of opensource( it's open source(https://opensource.org/osd/), you can read the 6th rule. It says the software should not be limited for commercial use.)

[–] obosob@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, I'm just answering the why question. Free software licenses don't have non-commercial clauses and they want an NC clause.