this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
4315 points (96.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35514 readers
465 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 312@lemm.ee 410 points 1 year ago (17 children)

This is Musk’s “Reichstag Fire” moment for Twitter.

The rate limiting is not because of “extreme manipulation”, but because of piss-poor code that Twitter deployed as part of their change to only allow tweets to be viewed if logged in. Twitter is effectively DDoSing itself right now. But, it creates an opportunity for Musk to create a narrative.

These “temporary” limits will probably remain inevitably, as they provide another benefit to Twitter - they drive Blue subscriptions. Unfortunately, they also repel free users from using the platform entirely, and at a much higher ratio.

Twitter is going to become even more of a cesspool than it already is at an alarming rate. Crazy how many established social media platforms have decided to crumble at the exact same time.

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 281 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Oh my god, this is just too funny.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

"The DDOS is coming from INSIDE the HOUSE!"

[–] lunarmedic@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My lord. And they can't/won't piece 1+1 together? Hanlon's razor dictates they are indeed idiots.

[–] 312@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago

In order to quickly fix it they would probably have to roll back the change to require login to view tweets, which would be admitting that it wasn’t caused by “attacks” on Twitter, which Elon won’t do. Rock and a hard place.

[–] zos_kia@lemmy.fmhy.ml 45 points 1 year ago

My guess is that they are severely understaffed. Happens when the new boss is a noob in the industry and fires the people he needs...

[–] millionsofplayers@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] lunarmedic@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry! kept getting lemmy network error

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Seven@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Elon was right, firing off many engineers didn't cause any DDoS attack from outside- as DDoS attacks are now happening from within

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] coldv@lemmy.world 144 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I find it especially bizarre that spez took inspiration and guidance from Musk. I can entertain the possibility of Musk intentionally driving Twitter to the ground (though he sure is taking the scenic route), but Reddit? It just seems like the rich tech bros have collectively lost their minds

[–] Haha@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] tsz@reddthat.com 102 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. While he loves to talk about how little reddit makes, he doesn't mention how much reddit pays him for that.

[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He’s rich not because of his salary (what Reddit pays him). He’s rich because of his equity/ownership in Reddit. But he can only monetize that if there are buyers.

For years this wasn’t a problem because private buyers and banks were happy to buy his shares or lend against them as collateral. However that market has been drying up over the past 18 months.

So he desperately needs to get to an IPO so he, and his Board of Directors and other stockholders, can dump their shares on an unsuspecting retail public market that doesn’t realize that the “profitability” was only achieved by destroying the user base, and that what they’ve actually bought is a ticking time bomb.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really hope the IPO bombs just to spite all the people, including Spez, that drove Reddit into the ground.

[–] MerliSYD@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem is that if the IPO bombs, it's the public investors that will lose money, as fuck u/spez and other shareholders will have dumped their steaming pile of shit shares onto the market from the start to reduce their shareholding and cash in.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 19 points 1 year ago

It would be the Institucional investors that have the opportunity to buy before the share is open in the market. After that is fair game to anyone stupid enough to buy it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

When people say that, they don't mean they hope it bombs after the IPO...

They mean they hope It bombs before the sale so Huffman and the others with a stake don't make much money

Anyone that buys the stock after the IPO would get a lower price.

[–] zos_kia@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah I'm pretty sure he got some preferential liquidation a few times and is cash rich.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ItsaB3AR@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Short Reddit on IPO. Give him a good farewell.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taco_ballerina@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Yes, and he would like to graduate into being obscenely rich through a successful IPO.

[–] Krazix@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Compared to musk? No. Not even close tongue same tier. But he's still a 1%er

[–] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

Already has more money than he should have.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] notExactlyI20@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yo for real, what's up with all these social media sites literally shooting themselves in the foot as we speak?.

Youtube planning to antagonize adblock users and limiting video watching, Reddit killing itself with ~~bureocracy~~ style and now Twitter doing this shit. Hopefully shit sites like TikTok or Facebook jump on the wagon too.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For reddit at least, The money from VCs dried up. They have to monetise fast or go broke.

Elon way way way overplayed for Twitter and the company is hemorrhaging money paying the loans he took out to pay for the purchase.

Google in general is in decline. Ad sales are down as the net becomes SEO'd to death. Marketing teams just aren't willing to pay for Google ads like they used to since the roi isn't there anymore.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But there are so many ways Reddit could have played this better. It wasn't just about monetizing. The API changes were in bad faith and meant to kill 3rd party apps without flat out doing it. Users would have been understanding if they charged a reasonable amount of started injecting ads into the API feeds, but instead they went full aggro and disrespected not just the devs working to make their platform better, but the users as well. If they wanted 3rd party apps to show their ads or charge a fee to remove ads I would have been understanding, but because of the disrespect I've dropped them.

[–] SwallowsDick@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

That plus their own app being abysmal. The official Reddit app is a terrible experience without the necessary features of the old ones

[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I forgot the actual numbers, but it's downright bizarre that Reddit can't figure out how to make money. They have a massive platform that is user-moderated for free, filled with free user-created content, with third party developers creating solid apps and features, again for free. Reddit should be able to do fuck all and make money

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] knightry@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In general, i agree with your post, but GOOG is up ~ 30% in the last 6 months. Specific parts of Google may be dwindling but their overall business is thriving right now.

[–] SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net 18 points 1 year ago

The stock is not the company, that's important to remember. The PE ratios for tech companies are totally out of whack compared to basically any other company.

Google stock is doing ok in part because they have Bard which means they're participating in the AI boom. I think that's going to turn out to be mostly hot air, but in the meantime it's helping a small number of companies stay afloat

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Unaffiliated_User@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Twitter successfully sold itself to a private investment firm for over market value. That's the dream for tech startups and never-made-a-profit digital services.

Anyone still using Twitter is an addict or a boomer, but that's exactly the audience that Musk wanted to purchase.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

The only reason twitter was popular is because you could check it for information. Towns and organizations would post updates there, it drove traffic, eyeballs, ads and revenue. This is the dumbest thing ever, even if he wanted to promote nazi ideology, it's idiotic because your only preaching to the choir. You cannot convert people when you drive them all away, so even if it wasn't about money, it's dumb.

[–] Seven@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Big social media companies are sometimes like lemmings- if one jumps off a cliff, others generally follow it because they did so

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There are several negatives to the limitation too. Advertisers (which are already leaving in droves) are even further discouraged from placing ads that have a much smaller chance of being seen.

Edit: spelling

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's the extra stupid part. Not only limiting the amount of content people can see, but also the ads he needs money from.

[–] Kainsley@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just less likely to be seen, but now a greater percentage of those views will come from Twitter blue subscribers as well who might not be their intended audience.

[–] offbyone@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

Does Twitter Blue show ads? I guess I assumed if you're paying you don't have to see those, but that would make too much sense 🤦‍♂️

[–] zos_kia@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there some source on advertisers leaving in droves? I've heard a couple stories on people (big accounts ands advertisers) loudly leaving but is it really a noticeable trend? I wonder if there's some publicly accessible way of knowing that.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It goes deeper than that.

This all started with the API changes. Before they were charging a fair price for the API and companies happily paid it for the convenience. Then Elon got greedy he started charging a ridiculous amount for the API so those companies decided it would be worth it to just deal with the annoyance and switch to scraping the website instead. But when you hit the website it's way less efficient than hitting the API because it's doing a bunch of mixing and ranking which is a lot more complicated and costly than serving static content, which costs a small fraction of real time algorithmic ranking. So now instead of making money off companies that want their data they're losing money on the cloud costs to serve the scrapers.

More recently, they haven't been paying their hosting bills to Google and their service was set to expire at the end of last month. What just happened at the start of this month? They added the limitations. That can't be a coincidence. Now the Google services weren't hosting the site itself, otherwise they'd probably be fully down right now, but it was hosting their trust and safety services for things like fighting spam. That could have also been hosting anti scraper services as well. Since they're so under staffed they probably couldn't swap the services in time, so instead of having anti scraping services like every other big company on the internet, they decided to cut service instead. It's just built up incompetence coming to a head.

[–] SwallowsDick@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

It's crazy how many products and situations go wrong because a super rich guy is being greedy

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Oh my god, this is just too funny

[–] br3d@lemmy.fmhy.ml 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Much like the case of Reddit, Musk might want to reflect on who actually produces all the content he's guarding so jealously, and ask himself what's likely to happen to the value of his site if he makes it difficult for millions of us to write all his content for free

[–] Mangoguana@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he just wants a private club with all the people already inside on a familiar and well respected platform imo, he just doesn't realize that his 5 minutes of fame are over, people see for who he really is.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago

I'm convinced he just wanted to tweak the algorithm, so everyone could see and appreciate his tweets, flooding them with stars and retweets

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] darkwiiingduck@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This actually isn't right. It's because musk has refused to renew twitter's Google Cloud Services partition, which expired June 30th, and has been (unsuccessful obviously) frantically trying to move twitter's cloud usage to in-house servers. Twitter has been the most popular social media website for almost a decade and never once have they had this issue. As usual everything musk touches turns to shit.

[–] offbyone@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

Are we sure on that? I've seen conflicting reports on whether they actually started paying or not (Ex. Engadget article from a week ago says they are). It's not public information so it's hard to verify.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, they also repel free users from using the platform entirely, and at a much higher ratio.

This is really, really bad for Twitter. The whole reason so many groups and people use it for official communications and announcements is because their audience can easily and freely see it. Rate limiting and requiring an account completely destroy that. And without it, Twitter really doesn't have much to offer.

Plus this goes directly against advertising lol

load more comments (8 replies)