this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
34 points (92.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4094 readers
149 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mackwinston@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't think the idea is to build houses on the wide roads, the idea is to build them beside the wide roads but remove space for private cars and instead repurpose that space for pedestrians and cyclists (in other words, have wide pavements ideally tree lined but instead of 4 wide lanes of cars maybe 2 narrow lanes with most of the space turned over as a public space for people).

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like your idea, but that's not what the article says

Needlessly wide roads should be torn up and replaced with boulevards of new housing

Only housing is mentioned.

[–] cyberpunk_sunbear@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

"A boulevard is a type of broad avenue planted with rows of trees. " - Wikipedia

[–] mackwinston@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, not just housing is mentioned but a boulevard and you cannot overlook that very important word and say the article only mentions "housing" because that is a seriously bad take on this article. By definition a boulevard is wide. It wouldn't be a boulevard if they made the road narrow by building houses on the road rather than by the side of the road, so while the article doesn't explicitly say it, by calling it "boulevards of new housing" implies that the thoroughfare does indeed remain wide, and becomes tree lined rather than car-lined.

The Cambridge English Dictionary defines a boulevard as:

"A wide road in a city, usually with trees on each side or along the centre"

(And not only is a "boulevard" mentioned in the article, the article also includes a picture of what a part of Rochdale would look like. The housing is on the side of the road, and some of the car lanes have been converted to pedestrian/cycling space, and trees are added).

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago

@mackwinston @snacks perhaps one motor lane in the centre, with occasional unloading spaces.

[–] snacks@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i hope so. Theres a brilliant video by B1M about Rochester in the US where they removed a 6 lane highway ringroad with this idea in mind and it looks amazing https://www.theb1m.com/video/america-interstate-highway-system-teardowns