307
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by UnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Wow this post got popular. I got called into work and didnt see the replies, sorry ladies and gentlemen! Trying to catch up tonight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except that the root cause of gun violence is that the human brain is inherently fallible and didn't evolve to own point and click murder devices.

You give everyone a powerful killing tool and surprise surprise you get more mass killings.

The UK has issues with knife crime, but it's absurd to suggest that they're remotely comparable to America's issues with gun crime or that the UK wouldn't be worse off if every kid with a knife was strapped dup instead.

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social -3 points 1 year ago

"Gun violence is because human brain no get clicky killy" might be one of the most absurd assertions I've seen. I'm looking forward to whatever semblance of support you can scrounge up for that assertion.

You give everyone a powerful killing tool and surprise surprise you get more mass killings.

By your reasoning, the rate of mass shootings should have correlated strongly with the saturation of firearms. Why hasn't it?

"People increasingly experience desperate extremes and surprise surprise you get more desperate actions" is both a more reasonable, rational fit and actually tied to reality.

The UK has issues with knife crime, but it’s absurd to suggest that they’re remotely comparable to America’s issues with gun crime or that the UK wouldn’t be worse off if every kid with a knife was strapped dup instead.

It's similarly absurd to pretend that the only relevant difference between the United States and pick a country is the presence of firearms.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“Gun violence is because human brain no get clicky killy” might be one of the most absurd assertions I’ve seen. I’m looking forward to whatever semblance of support you can scrounge up for that assertion.

The fact that suicide rates track with gun ownership? You really can't think through how our brains are evolved to handle being able to kill people slowly with our bare hands, but not being able to kill people at the click of a button from a distance?

Do you understand how evolution works? Do you understand how it's effortless to kill something with a gun accidentally at a distance but not to strangle someone? Are you capable of following a logical train of thought? Based on your insistence that America being the only country with weekly mass shootings having nothing to do with America being the only country with free access to firearms, my assumption is no, but honestly this point should not be a struggle. Imagine arming everyone with nukes and see whether or not we end up with nuclear scale catastrophes, now just scale the power levels down a bit. This really should not be hard to think through.

By your reasoning, the rate of mass shootings should have correlated strongly with the saturation of firearms. Why hasn’t it?

Lmao, way to weasel in the word strongly to try and pretend like they don't track! What about the suicide rate? Rate of domestic homicide? Oh what they all track with rates of gun ownership? Maybe our brains aren't great at handling that kind of power so casually ... oh no, actually it MUST be because America is the only country that struggles with poverty and inequality, that totally must be it, can't possibly be a flaw with a 200 year old document written by a bunch of slave owners.

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The fact that suicide rates track with gun ownership?

"Track with"? Did you mean poorly correlate with?

You really can’t think through how our brains are evolved to handle being able to kill people slowly with our bare hands, but not being able to kill people at the click of a button from a distance?

I'm still waiting for support for the first absurd assertion and you've gone and added another.

Do you understand how evolution works? Do you understand how it’s effortless to kill something with a gun accidentally at a distance but not to strangle someone? Are you capable of following a logical train of thought? Based on your insistence that America being the only country with weekly mass shootings having nothing to do with America being the only country with free access to firearms, my assumption is no, but honestly this point should not be a struggle. Imagine arming everyone with nukes and see whether or not we end up with nuclear scale catastrophes, now just scale the power levels down a bit. This really should not be hard to think through.

Oh, my - and now you've got to support the absurd notion that humanity only evolved for violence by hands despite our use of tools generally being considered a unique and crucial evolutionary advantage. It's ironic that your criticize understanding while demonstrating your own shortcomings.

Lmao, way to weasel in the word strongly to try and pretend like they don’t track! What about the suicide rate? Rate of domestic homicide? Oh what they all track with rates of gun ownership? Maybe our brains aren’t great at handling that kind of power so casually … oh no, actually it MUST be because America is the only country that struggles with poverty and inequality, that totally must be it, can’t possibly be a flaw with a 200 year old document written by a bunch of slave owners.

I'm not sure how a direct criticism of your argument's flaws is somehow weaseling. I'm getting the impression you don't understand what correlation even is, let alone whether or not it serves to prove causation.

Also, lol "track with"

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m still waiting for support for the first absurd assertion and you’ve gone and added another.

It's the same assertion, rephrased, but I know reading can be difficult

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social -1 points 1 year ago

It’s the same assertion, rephrased, but I know reading can be difficult

Your difficulty here certainly explains how you consistently manage to respond without actually addressing anything in the comment you're responding to.

At least you've given up the pretense to discourse - props.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
307 points (89.3% liked)

News

22962 readers
4451 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS