307
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by UnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Wow this post got popular. I got called into work and didnt see the replies, sorry ladies and gentlemen! Trying to catch up tonight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Floey@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Ban the breeding of all dogs.

[-] UnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A good idea when you consider bulldogs and boxer health conditions.

[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

What about dying breeds like English Setters? Like pandas they need some encouragement or assistance or they'll die out all together? Given what a good boy my mum's English is, I say preservation of the breed is worth it.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

As in selectively or sterilize all dogs?

[-] Alduin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

As in don't own and operate puppy mills. Don't play doctor Frankenstein with your dogs and create abominations. Don't forcibly impregnate dogs to make them pregnant.

The world of dog breeding is terrible and needs to end. Not the world of dogs just like...casually making puppies. That's fine.

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Puppy mills are terrible. As is breeding brachycephalic dogs like pugs, or particularly inbred breeds.

But working dogs are usually part of a deliberate breeding program for a reason. Seeing Eye, for example, breeds their guide dogs specially. You don't put random mutts in the Iditarod, nor would you use them as livestock guardians or to herd sheep. That breeding program might or might not involve purebreds, but it definitely involves breeding healthy dogs to purpose.

More to the point, though, what's wrong with someone getting a couple performance titles on a purebred dog, health testing it, and breeding it to another titled, health tested dog that's as distantly related as possible?

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like you missed the point of the person you're replying to or maybe replied to the wrong one?

Puppy mills that are for profit and abuse animals are not even close to the market you're talking about. Seeing eye dogs make great sense for breeding purposes since a person's life can literally depend on it. Actually both of your examples are when a dog isnt a pet first, their primary role is a job. Those aren't puppy mill type dogs. Seeing eye dogs are probably not going to be from irresponsible backyard breeders. Work dogs are probably from word of mouth in communities that need them.

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The world of dog breeding is terrible and needs to end. Not the world of dogs just like...casually making puppies. That's fine.

That doesn't say "only puppy mills need to end", but that all dog breeding needs to end because puppy mills are shitty, and we should just have casual oops litters instead.

[-] Floey@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

So you think puppy mills are terrible but using and abusing dogs for their labor is perfectly fine? You really supporting Iditarod?

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Abusing dogs for labor? No, I don't agree with that.

Merely using dogs for labor? That's fine.

Work is mentally simulating and enjoyable for many breeds of dog. A border collie who actually gets to herd sheep is going to have a lot more fun that day than one who just sat on the couch.

Huskies love running. This past March, a rookie fell off his sled and his team ran the 18 miles to the next station without him.

There's a reason why tons of dog owners do sportified versions of dog jobs for fun.

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

So then we just let them loose to procreate on their own? Or you saying we should just let the breeds humans create die out, and let the wolves thrive naturally in our society?

[-] Floey@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not against sterilization or adoption, just breeding.

[-] TechnoWarden@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, we loose them to procreate on their own. "Pure-breeding" often leads to many genetical defects. Dog breeds are not genetically distant enough to he considered species; "mutts" are real dogs.

[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Good breeders know to keep their genetic stock wider and look out for resessive traits, etc. They're not the same as puppy farms.

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think that's an even worse idea. It wasn't always a good thing, but those dogs have bad traits that we are aware of, and know how to fix through proper fixing dames to studs. We can systematically remove problem breeds that way so that they are healthy, well rounded dog breeds created by a design to undo all of the errors of designer dogs and stupid ass "dog trainers" for fighting has done.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
307 points (89.3% liked)

News

22962 readers
3974 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS