this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
524 points (95.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26924 readers
1563 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Privacy concerns are a very popular and valid talking point on Lemmy, so I would like to gather your thoughts and opinions on this. (Apologies if it's already been discussed!)

Would you support this? Would it work or even be viable? (If it could somehow overcome the rabid resistance from these big companies). What are your thoughts?

Personally, I'm getting more and more agitated at the state of this late stage global capitalism, where companies have the gall to ask you to pay or subscribe to their products, while they already make money from you for selling your data. It's been an issue for a long time now, but seems to really be ramping up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gelberhut@lemdro.id 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Generally, I personally, disagree. Usually companies do not get your data from the air, they provide people service and often for free in exchange. This is a model which made internet available for masses.

What I agree with - a transparency and control, more or less like GDPR suggests (not like it is usually implemented, though).

[–] neptune@dmv.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I feel like OP is suggested a world where you pay $5 a month to use Facebook, but you get the premium version for free if you sign off your rights. Maybe not a whole lot would change, except a higher awareness of the business model.

[–] gelberhut@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OP wants companies pay them. Regarding pay or watch ad (this is a usual way your data is sold): youtube, spotify and many others offer this option already now.

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imo companies should at least pay for the data used by said ads. Especially the ones that needlessly throw videos at people.

[–] gelberhut@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

They do - they provide you some service in exchange.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

regulations like transparency and user control only work when the ones with the data actually follow the laws.

[–] gelberhut@lemdro.id 4 points 1 year ago

Everything works only when involved parties (all, not just with the data)follow the laws.

[–] Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are plenty of instances of companies collecting your data either without you knowing or without you knowing you can opt out of collection. There needs to be a set standard provided and adhered to in regards to collecting personal data.

[–] gelberhut@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

Agree. And the actual attempt is called GDPR and CCo.

However, one can put in other direction as well: similar "standards" and laws against people who try to use a service without paying for it neither watching ad nor paying money.

[–] Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agreed, if there’s a clear benefit to harvesting my data, like I don’t have to pay for the service then that’s fine. There should be clarity on what data is collected and how it’s used so I can decide if the benefits justify the cost.

[–] ElleChaise@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That's a good point, they shouldn't just be allowed to say "we're improving our product with ur info lol" and call it a day. How? Like our tax money in my country, I heard the Aussies get a breakdown of where the money is going. Where's my breakdown? Where's the breakdown for the techno spying? Lack of info seems to be the business model with both of these systems, lol.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There’s a chain of reporting issue. Generally, the site you’re on (outside the social media shitholes) will keep track of some identifier of who you are, and which sites you visited. Then they will share your identifier with an advertising partner to deliver you advertisements. The advertising partner will take your data and pass it off to a data management platform (Hi Oracle!) who will then attempt to link you on that site to literally everything you have ever done. They have deals with Credit card companies, TV vendors, car manufacturers, cell service providers, public databases. That’s where the sketchiness happens. The worst part of it all is that realistically, the advertisers don’t care about all that data. They almost always want some very basic demographic data that fits in the old Nielsen family demographic data: It doesn’t make any sense to advertise a Lexus or investment advice to someone making minimum wage. Politicians want to know who likely voters are. Macy’s wants to advertise at people who shop at malls. They also want “Lives within 50 miles of my business”

The biggest worry is that the data platforms collect a lot of exact data that is not used except for super suspect Cambridge Analytica level targeted political advertising, and to add to it: They are reallllllly crappy at their jobs. I work in AdTech, so I can poke around at what they think I am and I’ve had things from “Salad Dressing lover” to being both unemployed and making $1 million/year in the same profile.