this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
118 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30553 readers
264 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Starfield and Baldur's Gate 3 both weigh the player down with encumbrance. Love it or hate it, it seems like it's here to stay.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A "stash" that is only accessible outside combat mostly preserves that balance, IMO.

Most games come up with a range of ways to get around the problem, even when they do have a strictly limited inventory with encumbrance:

  • Zero weight quest items

  • Ability to run or fast travel while encumbered (FO4 selectable perk)

  • A pet or NPC capable of carrying your less valuable stuff back to the vendor for sale (Torchlight had this, did Diablo? I haven't played in decades.)

  • Pack animals/robots

  • Portable vendors (Skyrim had a demon vendor you could summon once a day)

  • Bags of holding (or similar)

  • Warp chests (many chests with same contents/inventory around map)

etc. ad infinitum. The fact that most games implement a variety of ways to deal with absence of an infinite inventory is kind of a tipoff that it's more of a burden than a desirable aspect of gameplay. Most of these games are holding up a carrot (or several) to get you to pursue certain achievements just to reduce the monotony of inventory management.