this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
233 points (94.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43892 readers
992 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They were invented decades ago.

They have fewer moving parts than wheelbois.

They require less maintenance.

There's obviously some bottleneck in expanding maglev technology, but what is it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blazera@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if only this was a proposed technology

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean that hyper idiotic Hyperloop idea that’s just a warmed up remix of the vacuum train idea from the 1920s and will efficiently kill all passengers if a little thing goes wrong (if you can get a hundreds of kilometres long vacuum chamber airtight anyway)?

[–] blazera@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

its a big topic, just be aware that "vacuum" in the real world is a sliding scale of air pressure. vacuum tube doesnt automatically mean conditions on a spacecraft in sci-fi when a hole is shot through a window. You can cut air pressure to half of atmospheric, and have an extremely weak vacuum, and still get amazing efficiency gains. We already have routine transit of pressurized cabins in the form of planes.

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Still means 0.5 bar overpressure if something breaks, which is deadly. Also the proposed pressure for the Hyperloop was 0.1 atmospheres iirc. If there is a weakness in the tube it will fail catastrophically and a pressure wave kills anyone in it. Watch the video where the mythbusters implode that huge tank.

You basically bring a lot of the problems with space travel down to earth.

[–] blazera@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"vacuum tube doesnt automatically mean conditions on a spacecraft in sci-fi "

Half atmosphere is less pressure difference than normal passenger planes.

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The direction of pressure difference is important

[–] blazera@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its the same? Pressurized cabin in a lower pressure environment

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The problem is the high pressure environment outside the low pressure environment