this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
380 points (97.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44160 readers
1539 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me it is the fact that our blood contains iron. I earlier used to believe the word stood for some 'organic element' since I couldn't accept we had metal flowing through our supposed carbon-based bodies, till I realized that is where the taste and smell of blood comes from.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Speaking as someone who grew up in the 1980s...

Micro-SD cards almost don't make sense to me. I'm not saying I don't believe in them, because of course I have a few of them. Obviously they exist and they work. But. They're the size of a fingernail and can hold billions of characters of data. I uwve a camera that ive put a 128 GB microSD card in. A quick tap on the calculator tells me that's over 91,000 3.5" floppy disks. Assuming they're 3mm thick, that's a stack of disks 273 meters tall. But this card is so tiny that I have to be careful not to lose it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about the new 2Tb m.2 drives? Not only vastly larger yet still, transfer speeds are also insane. I once had a computer with a 20Mb hard drive, current drives transfer 600-1200mb per second.

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not so impressive, of course its faster when its smaller. The data have to travel shorter.

Jk, it is damn impressive!

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Actually, that's true! It's not significant enough to affect the throughput directly, but when you transmit data on parallel leads, they have to be roughly the same length in order to keep the signals synchronised with the time frames when they are received. Otherwise part of the data might not arrive in time. The higher the throughput (and shorter the frames), the greater the leads' lengths affect the timing. This is why you often see long squiggly leads on circuit boards - they extend the shorter leads to roughly the same lengths.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Eh, parallel hasn't been used for a while already. SATA literally means "Serial ATA" and no longer uses parallel connections. I haven't seen parlallel connectors since like a decade or so

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I saw 1tb microsd cards for sale at the shops the other day and had a bit of a 'what the fuck...' moment

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember my parents talking about some thing or other in star trek that would be impossible because you'd need "terabytes of storage, and that's probably not possible". And now you can go buy 1 tb of storage and lose it in your couch cushions.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Poor Keanu Reaves gave up his childhood memories in Johnny Mnemonic to store something like 100GB of data in his brain. I don't remember the Star Trek storage callout cause they were generally pretty good about just fabricating their own units for stuff (future sci-fi writers should take note, it's always easier to make up units then deal with pedantic people on the internet).

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

they were generally pretty good about just fabricating their own units for stuff

indeed, most of their references to quantities of information use quads; there are a few using bytes though.

[–] sysadmin420@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I lost a 1tb flash drive with ventoy and a bunch of files and I'm still mad, but I had a backup lol

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The latest SDUC standard allows for up to 128 TB.

[–] SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It gets better. The size of the SD card isn't the storage area. Look carefully at the back of an SD card and you should see how a tiny square area in the middle is a bit 'thicker' than the rest; that's the actual chip, that tiny bump!

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

SD cards make sense to me. Hard Drives... Now there is some spooky technology.

The reader head on a hard drive changes direction so fast, that it experiences accelerations like that of a bullet being fired, hundreds of times a second.

The "Fly height" or distance a reader floats above the platter is so tiny, that it would crash into a thumbprint.

The actual magnetic media that stores your data is a layer of iron a few atoms thick deposited on to a ceramic or glass platter, with a single atom layer of a protective metal coating (typically rhodium) in top of it.

Despite these incredible tolerances, they damn things are dirt cheap, and surprisingly reliable.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago

And the price of that 128 gb sd card? €10-15, 512 gb cards are even crazier right now at like €35 a piece, that's €0,068 per gigabyte

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Also fun, they rely on quantum mechanics.

Individual "bits" on a SD card are electron buckets that are either "full" (they have an electron) or not. 8 bits to a byte ~1 trillion bytes to a terabyte.

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

That's just another name for the save icon.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I really get the feeling that this question isn't being asked seriously but here goes.

Floppy disks are an older removable storage format for a computer. The media inside the disks was flexible like a piece of paper, hence the term "floppy". There were three different common sizes, there was an 8", a 5.25", and a 3.5". The 8" and 5.25" had the flexible media in a sort of heavy fabric and plastic sheath that was itself flexible, amd the 3.5" disks had a hard plastic cover on the outside, with a sliding metal door, and some people erroneously called these "hard disks".

[–] Still@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

I've got a 1tb microsd and it's crazy to see the difference between a 60MB harddisk and it