this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1204 points (86.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9817 readers
724 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oyo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How about having fewer kids? By definition nothing can be sustainable if population keeps growing.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago

That is happening. The replacement rate, if immigration is excluded, is below the 2.1 kids per woman in more and more countries as they develop.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/total-fertility-rate

Humans slow having babies as infant mortality drops. There is lag, causing a boom, but on the other side is a slow decline.

Hans Rosling did lots of talks on it.

[–] mekwall@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Population growth is in fact slowing down and have been doing so for quite some time. But we'll eventually run into the problem where there won't be enough working age people to take care of the elders.

Many countries (nearly all of the developed countries) are having too few kids to maintain their population and it can only be increased/maintained through immigration. Most experts believe that we will top out at around 10.5 billion in 2100 and then there will be a decline.

[–] GlitterCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People are having less kids, it's just that older people also live longer these days, which means it takes longer for the population to decline, still, is happening in a lot of countries, for example, Japan lost 200,000 inhabitants last year due to low fertility rates

[–] duffman@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We already are. It's the immigration policy that keeps housing demand up.

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US' immigration policy is very restrictive. The amount of people born still far exceeds the immigration rate.

[–] duffman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The birth rate is below the replacement rate. That's clearly not the issue.