this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That is the post

took-restraint

olimar-point pikmin-carry-lpitpikmin-carry-r barbara-pit

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ElRenosaurusReg@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk, it could be the autism, but I don't see "Confusing" and "Effort needed to parse" as the same thing, I view "Confusing" as something that would be easy to misinterpret, rather than something that takes effort to interpret, for example, missing oxford commas can make a statement confusing as the lack of them can cause two subjects to appear as one in a list.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, one of the definitions for confusing is:

Difficult to understand; not clear as lacking order, chaotic etc

You’re thinking of “confusing” as in confounding, or so nuanced and perplexing as to be out of reach of some people. Sentences are only difficult to parse in two ways: layered and perplexing (one kind of confusing), or broken/nearing nonsensical (the other kind of confusing). Confusing doesn’t have to mean the level of language is so high that it confuses simpler minds. It can be confusing by being so out of the ordinary and muddled that it takes some mental rearrangement to parse. My argument is this sentence falls into the latter. Still confusing. And could be a perfect example sentence for the dictionary definition I copy/pasted above.

[–] ElRenosaurusReg@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Thank you for clearing that up, friend 🥰