this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
463 points (98.5% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

45 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NYT gift article expires in 30 days.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/H55Gr

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 98 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The case was closely watched not only because it involved a Hollywood star on trial in the #MeToo era but also because two of the women had accused the Church of Scientology, to which they also belonged, of discouraging them from reporting the rapes to the authorities. The church denied that it pressured the victims.

It feels like this may be the larger story. I wonder if it'll embolden other Scientologists to come forward.

[–] Piers@beehaw.org 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They also allegedly killed the dogs of one of the victims in an attempt to silence her.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just when you think there are no depths they won't go to...

[–] bipmi@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Tbh I dont know why anyone would think there are no depths scientologists would go to. Its a sham religion entirely made to drain resources from its members into the pockets of the hierarchy of the "church". Its basically a criminal enterprise and should be treated as one

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Where's John Wick when you need him?

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Court documents also said that Masterson had raped another woman, identified as Jen B., in April 2003 after he gave her a drink. Jen B., who sought the church’s permission to report the rape, later received a written response from the church’s international chief justice that cited a 1965 policy letter, which for her raised concerns she could be ousted from her family and friends if she reported a fellow Scientologist to the police.

Imagine demanding that someone give up that much control over their own life and autonomy.

However, she should be commended for overcoming her fear:

Still, she reported the rape in 2004.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

However, she should be commended for overcoming her fear

Reporting a rape and seeing it through court is especially hard at the best of times - in a high profile case, while battling against the will of.your Church adds whole new levels of difficulty to it.

[–] kraftpudding@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Especially if that "church" is the Cult of Scientology, which are famous for ruining people's lives if they're considered a "supressive person"