this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1651 readers
6 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I find the detail of this Wikipedia page to be amazing. It was shared 2 months ago (thanks @SamC). The main things that have changed since then are a continued slight dip in Labour/National and a slight rise in Maori/ACT.

If you have the time and energy then remember to read the policy proposals by the parties that you don't like as well as the parties that you do like.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flashmedallion@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's funny how a lot of people seem to assume that it's more or less a forgone conclusion!

It's interesting, because I've read several times over the years that one of the strongest predictors for an election isn't just counting up who people say they'll vote for but rather who they think will win.

Everyone I talk to seems to think a National coalition will win, regardless of their political leanings. I certainly do because of this, even though though polling suggests it's far from a forgone conclusion. Elections can be so much about a general mood of the country on the day.

[–] SamC@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, this is referred to as the "bandwagon effect" and there is some evidence to suggest it does happen.

However, with a lot of these things, it's probably only making a difference at the margins. It might influence someone who is completely on the fence, e.g. if they couldn't decide between National and Labour, they saw National seemed to be winning, so went for them. But most people do tend to think carefully about who they vote for rather than be influenced by something "superficial".

[–] gibberish_driftwood@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is really interesting. Is it something to do with people wanting to feel as if they're on the winning team, even though you can effectively declare you're voting for someone and there's still no way for anyone to prove it^*^?

^*^ Although the recent trend from the past couple of elections of people photographing their completed ballot papers and posting to social media really needs to be clamped down upon, imho.

[–] SamC@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

This is really interesting. Is it something to do with people wanting to feel as if they’re on the winning team, even though you can effectively declare you’re voting for someone and there’s still no way for anyone to prove it*?

Yes, pretty much this. Deciding who to vote for can be a pretty difficult and complex decision. People end up relying on "short cuts", so something like the bandwagon effect happens. There's even evidence that shark attacks can influence how people vote.