this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
710 points (95.6% liked)

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6593 readers
5 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Today I posted a picture of a stamp with an animal in it and they said the picture contained nudity and made me take it down, but I reported a photo of a guy with a fully visible swastika tattoo and they said that's fine.

I'd like to start a Lemmy community with photos of stuff that they refuse to remove called FacebookSaysItsFine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem with unlimited free speech is that it lets the worst people be free to be even worse yet. There is no such thing as ethical absolutism of any kind; it's just extremism in a flashier suit, and extreme is by its very nature hostile because it can be used to justify literally anything. Especially by true believers.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Every few years someone gets the idea of creating an internet absolute free speech zone and a few months later figures out why it is a terrible idea. It is never people from vicious dictatorships sharing messages about freedom. It is always child porn, scams, spam, and Nazis plotting terrorist attacks.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Anonymity does that, not free speech.