this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
800 points (97.2% liked)

Games

32538 readers
1654 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

DLSS 3 is far worse than DLSS 2 IMO.

There's basically zero disadvantage to turning on DLSS 2. Most of the time you cannot or can barely tell the difference.

DLSS 3 introduces lots of artifacting, some frames straight up look like DALL-E image, it adds input lag, and it needs you to already have a high framerate to start with to make it bearable, text in particular gets mangled by it.

Fast paced games and games that rely on quick reactions are a no-go for DLSS 3. It's suitable for games like MS flight sim where adding input lag doesn't really matter and there's not rapid movement.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Knock it off with the fake news. My TV artifacts more than my 4090 when converting 24Hz films to 60/120. You can't even notice any artifacting in DLSS 3 without taking screenshots and pixel-peeping. Quit talking out of your ass. DLSS 3 FG works amazingly well in Starfield.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you think you can't see any artifacting with DLSS 3 then you are crazy.

[–] pory@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're arguing about visual fidelity with someone who uses their TV to "convert 24hz movies to 120fps". It's the equivalent of the guy who got into a heated debate over Italian food with a Redditor that also posted about drinking his own piss on /r/piss.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, because comparing apples to oranges is the same thing as drinking your own piss. Get real, my dude.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Do you not understand how analogy works? Nobody is comparing what you did with drinking piss.