this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
76 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Affirmative Action has now ended in the United States.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is one I actually agree with. I don't know of a solution to historical racism, but current racism against another group doesn't seem like it can be it. That would just lead to an unending loop IMO.

[–] mint@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

how is affirmative action as a concept contributing to "current racism against another group"?

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, I suppose it depends on your definition of racism, but to me giving preferential treatment to one group and lowering treatment of another based on race is a form of racism. From my understanding of the case, Asian and White applicants needed substantially higher SAT scores to be admitted.

[–] mint@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

That's not how it worked at all. Affirmative Action actually benefited white women more than any other minority group.

Affirmative Action was never about "lowering treatment for one race vs. another." It was about evening the playing field. That evening is gone and we have no solution as a replacement. It will demonstrably negative for minority groups (that aren't white women, lol) all because white people couldn't stand the idea of not having a leg up in something.

Which, btw, is the reason why your definition of racism is flawed, if not flat out incorrect. There has to be a power imbalance for racism to be real. Me calling someone a cracker doesn't mean anything compared to the structural inequalities I face as a black person. One of the few structural benefits I did have is gone now thanks to mediocre white people seething. Does that make sense?

[–] ConsciousCode@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I understand where you’re coming from since it is literally true, but fails to account for context. Consider a marathon in which half the participants were given 10 pound weights on each leg. Halfway through the race, the judges ruled those participants shouldn’t have weights on. Is the race now fair, since everyone is being treated equally? Of course not - they were immensely disadvantaged from the outset, so the only way to try to approach some level of fairness is to give them advantages to make up for their initial handicap. In theory, AA is meant to be corrective action to restore equity, at which point it can be dropped because it’s no longer necessary. AA isn't perfect and really needed to be replaced with less of a bandaid solution, but it was better than nothing which we now have.

Incidentally, this is also why “race blindness” is considered a bad thing in social justice. In theory it would be ideal that you don’t treat people differently, but in practice it means ignoring their disadvantages.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, we had to deny your application because you're Asian. Try another school.

[–] mint@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Affirmative Action has had a net positive impact on Asian Americans, given the fact that Asians had the largest college enrollment (59%), more than any other race.

A study from Georgetown University also found that Asian Americans actually benefit from affirmative action. It showed that if colleges only considered test scores, while Asian American enrollment would increase slightly, 21% of Asian Americans admitted under the holistic system would lose their spot.

In short, Asian Americans with lower SAT/ACT scores would give up their admission to Asian Americans with higher test scores. This would potentially affect lower-income Asian Americans, who cannot afford to spend money to prepare for those tests.

That said, your statement is so blatantly silly I'd like to confirm you're actually arguing in good faith, or just stirring the pot with a hypothetical that absolutely does not happen. Thanks!