this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
114 points (87.5% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5315 readers
27 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So it's almost July 4 so everyone in the US is gearing up for firework day. Plenty people have already had premature firings of fireworks in late June. Even in Canada we have our national day on July 1 and even though you're technically not even allowed to shoot fireworks in many major Canadian cities anymore, people still do and still do it days in advance. And it's not like celebrating with fireworks is a Anglo-North American thing either, pretty sure every country does it.

But here is why I don't think they should be used, and I will attempt to convince you as well.

I think the most obvious problem is noise pollution. Everyone, myself included, has been trying to comfort their dog whenever some asshole decides to unexpectedly shoot one off on June 27. It's generally doable to take your dog to a more remote area on the day of so they don't hear it, designated firework quiet zones in the city are a godsend for this, but do you expect us to go take our dogs away for a week before the actual day? It obviously affects cats and other pets too. As well as young humans, you might have a couple of those in your house as well. And mitigations by moving oneself away from the noise can't help the wildlife in the area, who are even more severely affected. The fast and erratic nature of firework sounds makes it very difficult to ignore. Wildlife can sometimes adapt to ambient human-caused noises like cars on a road, but basically no animal with hearing can tune out fireworks, not even humans. Sources are in the dropdown below, (pop the DOIs into SciHub to read them for free, I usually try to link free papers to begin with but it seems that everything on this subject is pay per view):

Sources. Trigger warning: Science

​ 

Second and perhaps the biggest issue is pollution. Fireworks are explosives, and as such use a lot of highly reactive chemicals to get the energy needed to fly high up into the air and release a ton of light for all to see. Highly reactive chemicals, especially ones not commonly found in nature and therefore organisms have fewer or no defenses against them, are generally very harmful to both human and ecological health. The unexploded fuel along with bits of plastic and paper casings get thrown everywhere in the vicinity of the firing site, and if you do it at a park with a lot of natural greenspace and wildlife, that's even worse. These pollutants are extremely long-lasting in the environment and get washed into groundwater, rivers and lakes, and eventually the ocean, not really decomposing in any amount of time relevant to human life, just dispersing and becoming less concentrated. Not to mention the smoke and fumes become air pollution and can spike the particulate concentration in an urban area. Same with the metal salts that give fireworks their brilliant colours, they don't really burn up and just fall to the ground or float around in the air. Metallic pollution is also extremely harmful to the environment. Not going to go too far into the ecology or biochemistry behind this, but here are some scholarly sources if you're interested. Sources are in the dropdown:

Sources. Trigger warning: Science

​​ 

The other major ecological impact, and the one that's been memed to death, is the risk of wildfires. Climate change is making summers hotter in dryer in many places, including the US and Canada. And might I remind you that July is indeed the summer in this part of the world. Along with mismanagement of forests and refusal to use controlled burns to reduce the risk of a massive, out of control wildfire, the risk of a single stray spark falling back down burning down entire forest ranges is not out of the realm of possibilities, nor is it unheard of. We've all heard the news reports about gender reveal forest fires and most people seemed to take it as a joke and not as the ecological and humanitarian disaster that a massive unquenchable forest fire actually is. When every year we get thousands of pictures of forest fires rolling through towns and making them look like Dante's Inferno, maybe we should be more careful about what incendiary devices we use. Sources are again in the dropdown:

Sources. Trigger warning: Mainstream News

​​ 

Good news is that this is not an unfamiliar issue. Fireworks are already being restricted or banned all around the world. China invented fireworks and they have deep cultural legacies and symbolism, and is extremely important to many people during certain holidays (speaking as a Chinese person), and even they are getting more and more restrictive with it especially in urban areas. I too will miss the sight of fireworks lighting up the sky during lunar new year, but I genuinely believe the ecological impacts outweigh the benefits. Fireworks are pretty, but so is ivory. If its only job is to look pretty and is extremely harmful otherwise, that's no excuse to keep it around.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the bigger problem in our society is entitled pet owners. The social cost of your dog shitting all over our public spaces multiple times a day and 365 days a year doesn't need to exist in a modern society.

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a cat. It stays indoors at all times. It makes no sounds and doesn't bother anyone. Yet it still gets scared half to death every new year's due to fireworks.

[–] Schooner@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Instead of spending money on a cat you could fund the education of a child.

Instead you're here whining about fireworks.

Pets are social burdens that should be outlawed.

Edit: All the people mad about this care more about their pets than starving children.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're super duper offended that we're discussing banning fireworks, because freedom obviously, yet in the exact same breath you say that pets should banned. Interesting.

[–] Schooner@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm just throwing the example back at the commenter?

If you want to use state sponsored violence to curb one behaviour, why not another that can have an equally good effect?

Or are you saying that starving children is less of a concern than fireworks and definitely less important than cats?

I'm not that offended, tone doesn't carry well over text. It's just a tired excuse of my pets get scared so fireworks should be banned.

Your pets are not the centre of the world!

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Or are you saying that starving children is less of a concern than fireworks and definitely less important than cats?

Stop putting words in other people's mouths if you want to have a civil discussion about something. People are talking about fireworks and you going "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?!?!" is a logical fallacy and a thought stopping strategy. No one here said they don't care about children.

Also, I literally mentioned how fireworks are also harmful to babies and young children.

I'm not that offended, tone doesn't carry well over text. It's just a tired excuse of my pets get scared so fireworks should be banned.

Your pets are not the centre of the world!

I made two passing remarks about pets and then spent the rest of the post talking about the ecological impacts of fireworks.

The environment, if you hadn't noticed, is indeed the centre of the world.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Is getting scared once in a while actually bad for the animal? Or is that just an inconvenience?

I think comparing fireworks to thunderstorms is okay. I would even go as far as to say that thunderstorms are where this behavior comes from. But in either case, we can not stop those and they have been around since the planet exists. So I have my doubts.

Unnecessary noise pollution still sucks, no questions asked, mostly from cars and motorcycles for me. But these once or twice per year things affecting pets? I don't think so.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

I know, I know, of course your cat is perfectly fine, but it's all those other pet owners who are causing the problem. However consider the massive ecological cost of the house cat to the bird and mammel population. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2380