this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
287 points (96.1% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

45 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please stop calling streaming services, "streamers". That term already refers to people who livestream. It's not cute and it's very confusing and annoying to hear about how the MPAA or SAG-AFTRA rail against "streamers" when the average streamer probably makes below $1k a year (if they're making anything), has no employees, and is likely doing their best to entertain a small group of viewers for 3+ hours, live, and without a script.

Oh wait, you're not talking about that kind of streamer, you're talking about the one that serves other people's videos on demand and makes billions a year, all while paying their employees like shit, pledging the bankrupt unions and driving people to piracy.

As someone who thinks a lot of twitch streamers are funnier and more entertaining that 90% of the trash released today, please don't dirty the term.

[–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 10 points 1 year ago

I honestly thought the headline was about a new twitch stream trend at first. It definitely seems like watching someone pick out movies on Netflix could be a Just Chatting trend.

[–] koreth@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Streamer" has been a widely-used entertainment-industry term for streaming companies for years. It's not a new thing people are making up to be cute.

[–] xep@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PelagiusSeptim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not referring to viewers in the title though, it's talking about the streaming services

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Study: Streamers Now Wasting Record Amounts of Time Finding Something to Watch

Content discovery challenges are forcing the average consumer to spend 10.5 minutes finding something to watch each time they access their streaming services according to Nielsen

Combining those, it sounds to me like their usage of "streamers" is referring to the viewers. If they meant the services, it'd read more like "Streamers now wasting record amounts of people's time".

[–] whataboutshutup 1 points 1 year ago

Streaming platform\service is how I've heard them being refered for years in different languages.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For how long? First time I heard that term was when Vinesauce started streaming via Livestream around 2010-ish (I didn't watch them during their Livestream days, wish I had; sounds like they had a neat setup).

Edit: justin.tv originally launched in 2007, which would have potentially put it before Netflix's announcement to start a streaming service.