this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
407 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5394 readers
226 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The video is here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oh so he's going to start running on an anti-capitalist platform and start trying to implement the radical societal changes we'll need to see to stop us further fucking up the planet?

It doesn't matter if you're "smart" enough to see the impact of climate change if you're stupid enough to do nothing about it.

[–] ThePac@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

I, too, live in a fucking dream world.

[–] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Democrats in a nutshell for sure

[–] RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The president has a lot less power than you seem to think. Only congress can do anything meaningful about climate change, and the chances of that happening are basically nonexistent.

Honestly, what would be the point of running for president on a climate change platform? Would you believe him? I certainly wouldn't. Would anyone actually believe he could follow through if he tried? No one with a basic understanding of how the government works should. What purpose would that campaign serve beyond getting your hopes up and inevitably making him a liar about something he never had the power to do?

If you want change, vote for the right congressmen and convince others to do the same.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

The president could at least push for this, even if he cant implement it.

Theres no excusing that shitheel.

[–] escapesamsara 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't worry, right after he's reelected he'll start a committee to encourage creation of a congressional sub-committee to get to the bottom of this new radical leftist divisionary idea of 'climate change' and propose a committee based on their findings to propose non-binding legislation to be voted on by 2050 only to get shot down by all republicans and whatever number of democrats are needed to ensure none of that ever happens. Mission Accomplished.