this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2082 points (94.4% liked)

World News

39455 readers
1932 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30mag@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (16 children)

An 18-year-old climate activist has called for Greenpeace to drop its “old-fashioned and unscientific” campaign against nuclear power in the EU.

People have been telling them this for a long time. Why is this news now?

[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The arguments of Greenpeace against nuclear power have nothing to do with age though. It's too expensive, which takes money away from e.g. wind and solar, with less carbon-free energy in the end for the money spent and more fossil fuels being used as a consequence. And still produces nuclear waste. Just develop batteries, hydrogen and the likes for storage. And ban or tax the use of fossil fuels. This debate is not over yet, not by a long shot, and climate will remain in the news as long as we live, I'm afraid.

[–] 30mag@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

None of that explains why this is newsworthy.

[–] escapesamsara 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The short answer is the fossil fuel industry and those who support it desperately want to encourage any kind of infighting among any and all people concerned with the climate; Greenpeace itself has been funded massively by the oil and coal industries throughout its lifetime specifically to oppose nuclear power. It's news now because as we look towards energy generation over the next 50 years we can either have large amounts of LNG and coal power plants while we pretend there's enough Lithium on Earth to support a renewable-based grid, or we can essentially eliminate 100% of natural gas, coal, and oil-based power plants in the next 15 years and work towards renewable grids with post-lithium power storage over the next 150 years. That latter scenario would nearly eliminate the global coal and natural gas industries, and severely harm the oil industry. So the more 'division' they can sow to delay a decision in either direction, the better it is for them.

[–] 30mag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Greenpeace itself has been funded massively by the oil and coal industries throughout its lifetime specifically to oppose nuclear power.

Do you have a source for that? I don't think you're lying, but I would like to see evidence that supports that statement.

You know, "trust but verify".

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)