345
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

This shouldn't come as a huge surprise. Meta is moving forward with their plans for Theads and the Fediverse, and their adjusted terms reflect a new impending reality for Fediverse users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 27 points 1 year ago

Unless I’m misunderstanding, that is simply a privacy policy that covers what is saved via federation. The same is true for any federated service, including my server, as I follow [!fediverse@lemmy.ml](/c/fediverse@lemmy.ml), I save all your likes, shares, profile pictures etc. for this community.

[-] deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Technically, yes, you save metadata of all of those things. However: you are not a company that profits from vast amounts of data ingestion.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

However: you are not a company that profits from vast amounts of data ingestion.

The entire current Fediverse isn't vast data by Meta, Google, Microsoft, and Apple standards.

[-] deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You aren't making the point you think you're making. Sure, at somewhere between 8 to 11 million accounts, the Fediverse is a small pond. Meta is a gigantic whale. Ingesting the entire graph of everyone on the network would be relatively trivial for them, storage-wise.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yes, but do you analyse this information to sell it to advertisers? Will you start posting sponsored content based on this information? And will the money you collect benefit the community you live in, or will it buy you another politician?

[-] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 7 points 1 year ago

But it’s still no news in any way. This article is simply saying "Threads still plans to federate, eventually", nothing else changed.

[-] deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Altering the language of a service policy (or, writing a new one) is usually a good indication that something is indeed about to change at a larger level.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's also an indication they're following US law. They can't collect data without stating it.

[-] danielton@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here...

What's to stop them from scraping the Fediverse without federating? If they really want the data, they could very well find a way. At least they're spelling it out here and announced an attempt at proper federation.

[-] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The article discusses this, a bit. One of the other platforms is considering an enhancement to require request signatures on non-ActivityPub APIs, I.E. Meta can make unsigned requests, where the server doesn't know who they're from, but only get minimal (or no) data back, or Meta can make signed requests, and instance owners get to decide what data (if any) they're okay with sharing to Meta, based on Meta's privacy policies. Beyond API's, you're talking about web scraping, which is something the industry has been handling for decades.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It also says exactly what they're planning to collect for starters. That was news to me.

[-] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 4 points 1 year ago

Again, that’s just what federates and automatically gets saved. You could have gotten that information by checking any proper Mastodon instance privacy policy or reading about the Fediverse on a more technical level.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It still news to me.

[-] sab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ip address is only sent to a users home server though.

[-] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 13 points 1 year ago

No idea how it works for Mastodon, but for Lemmy they will have the IP of the server, nothing else is available and they can’t magically get it.

[-] sab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't put it past them to put tracking images into posts though. Either way... I wouldn't be happy on a server that is connected to threads.

Speaking of which... I see lemmy world see still hasn't defederated from Threads. I guess it's time for me to kill my account here.

[-] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 3 points 1 year ago

I’m glad I have my own instance where I only defederate from instances creating issues.

[-] sab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I might end up using a personal instance as well. But in that case I'll probably end up with an instance whitelist, rather than defederating from disliked ones.

[-] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 2 points 1 year ago

I’m currently defederated from only 2 instances. You would be unable to have this discussion with me if you went your way, unless you whitelisted all those mini-instances and regularly checked for new ones.

[-] sab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, bummer. I thought I'd be in the clear because we're having this conversation on Lemmy.ml. Thanks for straightening me out.

[-] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 2 points 1 year ago

No, defederating also blocks you from seeing the comments and posts of users of those instances, no matter where the communities are. That is literally the only reason for my 2 defederated instances so far (hexbear and lemmygrad) because I got sick of all the fascist comments.

[-] sab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Does that mean that the only way of stopping my data from reaching Threads would be for them to defederate from my instance?

[-] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 1 points 1 year ago

No, if you defederate from them, all connections to them are blocked. But federated data is public, if they wanted it, they could just grab it via the API.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
345 points (92.2% liked)

Fediverse

17560 readers
106 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS