this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
345 points (92.2% liked)

Fediverse

17735 readers
35 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This shouldn't come as a huge surprise. Meta is moving forward with their plans for Theads and the Fediverse, and their adjusted terms reflect a new impending reality for Fediverse users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 117 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Provided that a Third Party User is followed by or following a Threads account, Meta will ingest these pieces of data specifically:

Username

Profile Picture

IP Address

Name of Third Party Service

Posts from profile

Post interactions (Follow, Like, Reshare, Mentions)

So if you follow a threads user or even if a threads user just follows you, they pull all this data?

IMO this seems like reason to defederate across the board. Someone else can leak your info to Meta.

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Question, is this not how every activitypub server works?

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but not every server is owned by Meta.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok, so we're back to defederation not because of any existing tangible evidence in this circumstance, but "because it's Meta". It's fine if that's your opinion and all, but let's stop spreading misinformation on the dangers of collecting the data required by anyone for federation.

And if you're here and pretending to care about data privacy at least try to do the bare minimum in understanding how the Fediverse works.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hi, I agree that there needs to be discussion.

But let’s be honest here. If meta made a lemmy/mastodon instance we would probably defederate them as well since every bit of data is for their financial gain and nothing else.

I don’t see how the worlds master manipulator and anti trust poster child is even remotely worth discussing about. We have established time and time again that „meta bad“. Why would we now not just accept the fact?

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think there is a bit of hysteria about Threads/Meta and some people are trying to push back. There are plenty of people in this thread that don't fully understand federation and are knee-jerk reacting because it's Meta.

However, I totally agree with the sentiment being expressed, which is to keep Meta and large corporations as far away from Lemmy as possible. This is a community-run space that is a haven from the corporate internet, and indeed capitalist society in general. Protecting this space should be our highest priority.

I feel that some of our more technical users are losing the forest for the trees in this discussion. Believe it or not, some Lemmings don't come from a 30 year tech background and don't fully understand how the platform, or indeed the internet as a whole, actually functions.

This group of people, which includes me, are acting rationally by opposing any interaction with Meta on grounds of principle. We don't know exactly what we are scared of, but we do know if there is any vulnerability or weakness that Meta is trying to exploit, they already know their plan and we won't know until it's too late. Meta is a terrifying behemoth just waiting for a chance to consume Lemmy. I would argue that a little bit of hysteria is justified in this case.

Edit: just to clarify, this is more of a response to the parent comment, I think we are in agreement. I didn't want to start another reply thread so I figured I would build off your point.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for pointing that out. I‘m sort of between the two. Doing IT more or less professionally for 20+ yrs but I can’t tell you the definitive workings of the fediverse either. I understand the principles and I like them.

Have a good one. :)

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like I said, that's a fine opinion to hold. What isn't fine is the constant spinning of facts and narratives to suit a personal bias, regardless of how I feel about that bias.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I‘m not sure I follow. Did I spin facts?

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not that I'm aware of? Not saying you personally did, I'm discussing the context. This post and the top level comments.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Ok. That wasn’t clear to me. Thanks for elaborating.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

not because of any existing tangible evidence in this circumstance

Oh, we're defederating exactly because of tangible evidence that Meta steals every information it can about you. I personally stripped Meta almost entirely out of my life, I definitely don't want them crawling back just because someone else wants to use Threads.

And if you’re here and pretending to care about data privacy at least try to do the bare minimum in understanding how the Fediverse works.

Oh, I do. I'm my own instance admin, I work as a senior architect and grasped the concept of Fediverse quite fast.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not because of any existing tangible evidence in this circumstance

If you're going to quote me I'd appreciate if you didn't cut out relevant parts of it to fit your argument.

Oh, I do. I'm my own instance admin, I work as a senior architect and grasped the concept of Fediverse quite fast.

The "you" in my comment was a generalized "you", not you specifically.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

If you’re going to quote me I’d appreciate if you didn’t cut out relevant parts of it to fit your argument.

Sure, edited the comment to include it, it doesn't change my argument at all.

The “you” in my comment was a generalized “you”, not you specifically.

Hard to distinguish.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, this is why if you upvote a post or comment from Mastodon (and friends) from Lemmy/Kbin/etc it appears as a "Like" for them, as an example.

Sans the IP address, that would be of the server your account is on, not your personal IP.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Isn't this just public information anyway, what's the problem with them taking it?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's Meta. This is just the beginning. Stop them right from the start. Fuck these corporations.

[–] xuxebiko@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

Story of the punk bar bartender and nazis

based on @iamragesparkle;s tweets

I was at a shitty crustpunk bar once getting an after-work beer. One of those shitholes where the bartenders clearly hate you. So the bartender and I were ignoring one another when someone sits next to me and he immediately says, “no. get out.”

And the dude next to me says, “hey i’m not doing anything, i’m a paying customer.” and the bartender reaches under the counter for a bat or something and says, “out. now.” and the dude leaves, kind of yelling. And he was dressed in a punk uniform, I noticed

Anyway, I asked what that was about and the bartender was like, “you didn’t see his vest but it was all nazi shit. Iron crosses and stuff. You get to recognize them.”

And i was like, ohok and he continues.

"you have to nip it in the bud immediately. These guys come in and it’s always a nice, polite one. And you serve them because you don’t want to cause a scene. And then they become a regular and after awhile they bring a friend. And that dude is cool too.

And then THEY bring friends and the friends bring friends and they stop being cool and then you realize, oh shit, this is a Nazi bar now. And it’s too late because they’re entrenched and if you try to kick them out, they cause a PROBLEM. So you have to shut them down.

And i was like, ‘oh damn.’ and he said “yeah, you have to ignore their reasonable arguments because their end goal is to be terrible, awful people.”

And then he went back to ignoring me. But I haven’t forgotten that at all.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does defederating them stop them from getting this public information if they want it?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point. I guess they could just fire up a shell instance and get all the good stuff. I wouldn't be too surprised, actually.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

They don't even need an instance to get they can just scrape it, like anyone can with public info. They wouldn't even need to make an account for the scraper.

[–] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, by design: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/methods/accounts/

IMO, the problem is not them taking the information per se, but in abusing that info to further the massive surveillance apparatus that harms society.

[–] ComfortablyGlum@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

This and the constant lying while doing it!

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Public? Idk, maybe. I wouldn't generally consider my IP to username to be public. Comment and post stuff, sort of. But even if it's public, I still wouldn't want Meta consuming it.

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t generally consider my IP to username to be public.

Are they talking about your IP address or the service's? Does ActivityPub even share the user's IP address with other nodes in the network? That'd be crazy, so I assume that it doesn't. Then Meta can't find out your IP address.

[–] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Does ActivityPub even share the user's IP address with other nodes in the network?

No this is not in the specification.

A malicious instance could in theory distribute this information but it would be non-standard. Of the 2 systems I've studied - Mastodon and Lemmy - neither do this.

Are they talking about your IP address or the service's?

In this scenario they would be talking about the IP address(es) of the services.

[–] lolgcat@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks for the clarification. That claim seemed really off.

I've assumed that what you see publicly is basically what's synced. Obv. your instance can have a few more meta details on you, like IP, device info, possibly all the exif they've stripped from uploaded photos, but these things aren't in the ActivityPub outbox

If a Threads user posts an image, and Meta hosts it, and I scroll through my feed and see it, my client will hit their server for said image. And Meta can collect my IP.

Meta basically invented this shit.

[–] chris@im.allmendenetz.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@MrScottyTay

Isn’t this just public information anyway, what’s the problem with them taking it?

wake up man...

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm wide awake, isn't this just the information transferred when federating? But they just have to put it into a TOS because they're an actual company with liability? I really don't see the issue with them having this information.

[–] joeldebruijn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They correlate the content of your posts with all the other data they have about you, taken from every app (besides WhatsApp, FB etc) that has FB trackers built in. Then that aggregated profile will be used with AdTech to serve ads and make money. I personally object to Meta making money with my personal data without me using their products.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just how adtech works in general. Every ad company has a profile on who they think you are, well more technically a cohort of potential similar profiles. Also not all profiles can equated to a single person and a single person may have multiple. That's how wishy washy the whole tech is. It's good enough though. Way better than seeing those flashy "download these smiley trail mouse cursors" ads the old internet used to have. Still. I don't see the problem here, it's just about making ads more relevant to you. If you're not the kind to let ads sway you anyway than what's the big deal? And if you are the kind to be swayed at least they'll be actually relevant to what you're into.

[–] joeldebruijn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The big deal is I help others make money of me without my consent or getting something back in return. At least not usefull to me. On top of that they track the hell out of me with surveillance.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Because fuck them. This is step one of their 20 step plan to do evil shit.

[–] xuxebiko@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Won't matter much in a democracy, but in a dictatorship or atcracy it means life & death.

In India, people have been imprisoned for posts & tweets for calling out Hindu supremacist Modi govt's anti-democratic policies & communal acts, Some of them have been violently assaulted in their homes by Hindu supremacist thugs for their posts and tweets because the dictatorial govt has stooges in both Meta & Twitter who access the ip address which is tracked down by the state.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if my instance says other services and instances can't do that? Are meta then breaking the law?

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If your instance says nobody can fetch its messages that just means turning off federation

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we put terms as to how the data is used / not used? Surely that could put an end to meta's dark move?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that should be possible, back it up with the GDPR as well.

[–] jhulten@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most of this is just part of Federation. When I saw this comment my client/server didn't have to fetch it from your server. It was pushed when you posted it so I had it locally.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but if you host an image, and my client prefetches it, it's going to exposed my IP to your image server. And if you have clauses saying you're collecting IPs...

Meta basically invented this shit. They'll do it again. It's what they do.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If a Threads user is following you, they need most of this information. It's literally how the Fediverse works. The only thing that isn't is your IP address, and that's something that I'm not sure they'd even get. That might be your host's IP address.

Remember, the Fediverse isn't a bunch of iframes looking at 3rd party websites. It works by mirroring remote content. A follow is literally a request to ingest posts from a user.

Yes, but many clients are going to go look up images manually. If it's a Threads post, it's likely hosted by Meta servers, and they can easily see your IP when doing that. And they're saying they might collect IPs from you even if you're not using their service directly.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah, no shit, they literally can't federate without this data, that's how ActivityPub works lol.

Why do you think you can see lemmy.ca votes on lemmy.world?

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

No, if you're on the fediverse and someone from a threads instance interacts with your instance.

The IP address is only of the instance server, not yours.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

.. why? All of this is more / less public information about you? Even if you defederate, they could crawl and get all of this info (except maybe ip).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rastilin@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't get it, third party users can't consent to your stupid license agreement anyway. You're still stealing their data.

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Take a torch to em!

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

if any of the big corperate socmed sites were just standard fedi instances I'd defed from them in an instant for a litany of things. just goes to show how abused we are on them.