this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
269 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

22598 readers
74 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How would you have less money than you do now, if we removed what you pay in rent as an expense?

[–] Acid@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because in some places renting is so much cheaper than buying it’s comical. Go look into rent vs prices of property and mortgages in London in the UK for example and then we can talk.

[–] CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Renting can literally NEVER be cheaper than buying, because the landlord's mortgage MUST be less than the rent you're paying! If you'd had the option to buy the same place for what the landlord did, you'd be paying significantly less each month.

So what you mean is, landlords bought up all the cheap housing and all that's left to buy is what they can't bleed a profit out of.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Buy me a house then, if they're so much cheaper than renting.

I'll wait.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not telling them to buy a house. We were trying to point out that landlords are leeches who provide nothing of value and suck up large percentages of peoples income.

The hypothetical here is if you weren't paying your landlord, you would have more money, because you're already paying them amd now you're not.

I've heard the real estate situation in London is particularly awful, even compared with other major cities where its also bad for similar reasons.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've explained all of this already. Have a good one.

[–] Venus@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In fact, you never explained it. You've just repeatedly asserted it.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Sucks to find a hexbear that's not cool. Not everyone has your living situation. You should know that being from hex.

[–] Venus@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have no idea what you're talking about

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

You're the only one who has made assumptions about other people's living situations.

No one has commented on or judged your living situation. The only thing any of us have been commenting on is that landlords are leeches who do not provide anything of value. Their whole point of existence is to leech value from working people like you and myself.

Has it crossed your mind that various people have tried to tell you the same thing, and they all agree with each other, just might have a point youre not getting? As opposed to us all being "ignorant"?