this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10180 readers
112 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look I hate the guy plenty, too, but this isn't exactly solid ground to start a discussion with. The article provides plenty of ground to talk about linguistics or at the very least not just hate on him. I think it's important to point out that he was not just a deplorable person, but that the very reasoning he used to argue in favor of his points was not based in reality.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed, sorry, it was just the format of the title made me want to format my personal opinion on him as well.

That's just, like, your opinion, man.

Also, just to point out:

but that the very reasoning he used to argue in favor of his points was not based in reality.

who ignored reality to legislate his twisted vision from the bench

I feel like I covered that.