this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
387 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29057 readers
6 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

At the time of writing, Lemmyworld has the second highest number of active users (compared to all lemmy instances)

Also at the time of writing, Lemmyworld has >99% uptime.

By comparison, other lemmy instances with as many users as Lemmyworld keep going down.

What optimizations has Lemmyworld made to their hosting configuration that has made it more resilient than other instances' hosting configurations?

See also Does Lemmy cache the frontpage by default (read-only)? on !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] s900mhz@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I may be wrong, but there is a branch in the works (UI repo) that pulls the web socket out and replaces it all with http calls. So the web socket may not be here for long

[โ€“] PriorProject@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're correct, the devs are already committed to deprecating the websocket API. This may make caching easier in the future and people may use it more as a result. I'm a little bit skeptical as most of the the heavy requests are from authenticated users, and web-proxy caching authenticated requests without risking serving them up to the wrong user is also non-trivial. But caching is not my area of expertise, there may be straightforward solutions here.

But my comment was in reference to current releases in use on real world Lemmy servers.

[โ€“] s900mhz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I didnโ€™t intend to downplay your comment. Caching at the proxy later with auth is something I am not familiar with. I never had to implement it in my career. (So far ๐Ÿ˜…) I just wanted to make it known that the web socket may be a thing of Lemmy past for anyone unaware

[โ€“] PriorProject@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I didnโ€™t intend to downplay your comment.

I never interpreted it that way. Your comment was helpful, and I was expanding on it with more context. Lemmy on, friend.

[โ€“] s900mhz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Good to hear! Lemmy on ๐ŸญโœŠ