World News

22059 readers

84 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

US Supreme Court sides with man who sent female musician barrage of unwanted messages (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 year ago by socphoenix@midwest.social to c/news@beehaw.org

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy shit. Supreme Court just declared open season on women.

[–] updawg@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, they declared Colorado's law is bad. This was a decision written by a liberal woman, joined by the other two liberal justices and four of the conservative ones. They do not have it out for women.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They essentially said that the messages he sent were covered under the first amendment. Have you read the messages he sent?

[–] Arthur_Leywin@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Among Counterman's communications to Whalen were messages that read: "Was that you in the white Jeep?" and "You're not being good for human relations. Die. Don't need you." Others used expletives.

Counterman, citing mental illness and delusions, argued that his messages were not intended to be threatening and were thus protected speech.

Not the guy you responded to but god damn... I can't see that message being interpreted as anything BUT a threat. All I gotta do is declare insanity I guess.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Those were some of the most tame, to be honest.

Counterman told two of the women that “people in this position that I’m in right now have been [known] to have gone and killed people. Take nine millimeters and blow their heads off and shit like that. * * * I know where you’re all living.”13 He told another woman that he “ha[d] all your addresses and guess what? You ever heard of a letter bomber? Guess what I’ll be comin at ya with kerosene.”14

Also

In March 2011, a grand jury indicted Counterman for violating the federal criminal-threat statute again. 17 This time he was charged with leaving a woman a voicemail saying: “I’m coming back to New York by the way, OK? Maybe this month in March OK. I may be coming back his month or next month. I don’t know which. I’m looking forward to meeting up with you. I will rip your throat out on sight.”18

Source

The man had also repeatedly made new accounts to continue messaging women after they blocked him. Multiple times.