this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
122 points (96.2% liked)

Programming

17424 readers
68 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] o11c@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The solution is quite simple though: dogfood.

Developers must test their website on a dialup connection, and on a computer with only 2GB of RAM. Use remote machines for compilation-like tasks.

[–] variouslegumes@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Totally, pretty much all browsers include a way to simulate network conditions. Chrome also includes a way to simulate CPU slowdown.

[–] o11c@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

and yet the very fact that you have to go out of your way to enable them means people don't use them like they should.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Server rendered sucks ass. Why would I want to pay for an always running server just to render a webpage when the client's device is more than capable of doing so?

Centralization is just pushed because it's easier for companies to make money off servers.

[–] philm@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't have to render everything on the server, a good hybrid is usually the way to go. Think SEO and initial response. I think lemmy-ui could will also benefit from it (google results)

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it will give you the best of both worlds, but at a fundamental level I still hate that I have to pay for an always running server just for SEO, if I can get away with it I'd much prefer a purely static site that has to have its content pages rebuilt when they change.

[–] sznio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because it's better to deliver a page in a single request, than to deliver it in multiple. If you render the page on the client you end up making a lot of requests, each one requiring a round trip and adding more and more delay.