Lemmy NSFW

11904 readers

3 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

yay@lemmynsfw.com

MikeyMongol@lemmynsfw.com

gavi@lemmynsfw.com

Limeey@lemmynsfw.com

bobbiguy2122@lemmynsfw.com

metaconnoisseur@lemmynsfw.com

216

Should we ban scat fetish? (lemmynsfw.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by yay@lemmynsfw.com to c/lemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com

NSFW 171 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As admins, we removed the scat communities, thinking that scat was covered by the NSFL. However, some people have opposing views on this matter. What do you think about it? If people want it allowed, then we can restore content.

https://strawpoll.com/wby5Ae7PXyA

Edit: My answer for friends in the comments; The main reason NSFL was banned is because we currently don't have the tools to separate porn from NSFL. I'm in favor of the ban because I think its the same way in scat. If we had enough tools right now, we wouldn't be ban the NSFL either. Although, I agree that voting for niche fetishes doesn't make sense.

Edit 2: Also I don't want to think about shit anymore. I'm out 😀 https://lemmynsfw.com/post/117500

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MikeyMongol@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a feature, not a bug, though there's some debate on the Lemmy GitHub about the wisdom of locally caching federated nsfw content.

[–] Bandeau@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It should be possible to cache the content without displaying it. Caching content should be a performance enhancement that doesn't otherwise impact users.

[–] taladar@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Caching has other downsides though, mostly for content that might not be legal in an instance's jurisdiction.