this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)

News

19 readers
12 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

The Navajo Nation had argued that their water rights were protected under an 1868 treaty.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] RoboRay@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's just how legal cases work... if you sue a state, it's documented in court records as a suit against the sitting governor. If the governor changes, the title of the suit changes.

Same thing here with the president. It doesn't matter who wins the election... any ongoing court cases are now against the new chief executive of the government.

[โ€“] updawg@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Is that true? This case was Arizona v. Navajo Nation, which was consolidated with Department of the Interior v. Navajo Nation. These cases were brought by the government, not by the Navajo, but if they were, this case would have still been Navajo Nation v. Arizona. Is the respondent/defendent not the same as who the case is "against?"