this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)
Fediverse
12 readers
3 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
An application that has hard coded censorship also has other unethical practices, I'm shocked π
Oh no they are blocking the worst right wing extremist instances from using there work.... what a shame....
gab.com
gab.ai
spinster.xyz
truthsocial.com
are the blocked domains which are right wing heavens
And donβt most Mastodon instances have those defederated as well? Theyβre not part of the wider Mastodon community to begin with.
It's against the principles of free software to deliberately restrict what a user does with software on their own machine.
show me those principles please ?
I feel like they probably don't want to be associated with those instances, considering they all seem to be extremist ones.
They're certainly shitty instances. They're free to block them if they want, since you can always just fork the source and remove that bit.
But I don't think that the project is associated with any particular instance that it allows you to log in to. They're taking a definite negative stance. They're associating themselves, just as anti rather than pro.
Personally, I think it's a little silly. Despite the term being overused (and not even being a bad thing usually), its a classic example of the annoying kind of virtue signaling. Doing a silly little thing that makes no difference at all while trying to make yourself look good to peers. It's like they want credit for taking on the "extremist" instances, by doing a bunch of nothing other than some mild finger waggling.
What hard-coded censorship does it have? It's a shame to hear this, as it's seemingly a nice app.
They have hard-coded list of domains to disallow logging in. Logging in will redirect them to a rickroll video instead of the instance's login interface.
One that I know of is that it does not allow you to log in to some instances (but I don't remember which ones right now)
If I'm not mistaken, Husky has these restrictions removed