this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
172 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
3750 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
172
AMD denies blocking Bethesda from adding DLSS to Starfield | Starfield DLSS mod locked behind a paywall (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AMD denies blocking Bethesda from adding DLSS to Starfield | Starfield DLSS mod locked behind a paywall::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

and then port their successful titles to other platforms

Well, then they're not exclusives, are they? I get the point to speed up time to market, but I'm questioning the benefit of having "lifetime exclusives", or anything beyond 1 year, honestly.

[โ€“] Kelly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The implication is of course that less successful titles will not be ported either because the company runs out of money or feels they are better off working on their next title than investing more resources on porting a middling title to a second choice platform.