this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
397 points (85.6% liked)

Technology

59428 readers
4008 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ChatGPT generates cancer treatment plans that are full of errors — Study finds that ChatGPT provided false information when asked to design cancer treatment plans::Researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital found that cancer treatment plans generated by OpenAI's revolutionary chatbot were full of errors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZodiacSF1969@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can understand the plagiarism argument, though you have to extend the definition of it. If I am expected to write an essay, but I use ChatGPT instead, then I am fraudulently presenting the work as my own. Plagiarism might not be the right word, or maybe it's a case where language is going to evolve so that plagiarism includes passing off AI generated work as your own. Either way it's cheating unless I was specifically allowed to use AI.

[–] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the argument and the sources are incongruous, that isn't the fault of the LLM/AI. That's the authors fault for not proofreading and editing.

You assume an inherent morality of LLMs but they are amoral constructs. They are tools, and you limit yourself by not learning them.

[–] ZodiacSF1969@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I didn't say anything about the sources being incongruent? That's a completely separate issue. We were talking about plagiarism.

I don't understand the morality comment either, I didn't ascribe any morality to AI, I was talking about whether using them fits the definition of plagiarism or not.

If you are expected to write it yourself, and you use an LLM to generate it, then that's cheating in my opinion. Yes, of course we shoukd learn to use AI, but if you are told to do something and you get a person or LLM to do it for you, then you didn't complete the task as you were told. And at university that can have consequences.