this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
564 points (84.3% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] leonardo_arachoo@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

While cool, I am surprised this is considered noteworthy enough for an article. There's so much experimentation constantly going on with these models, what makes this special? It's more like the inspiration for a creepypasta.

[–] Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a pretty firm believer that Loab is a hoax "cryptid" due the unwillingness of the author to publish anything on the generation parameters. I think the author got one weird result from putting "Loab" in the negative prompt and then used img2img from there. Anyone who shows images of a "cryptid" they discovered but refuses to show proofs is untrustworthy in my opinion.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, seems like that's everyone claiming to have found a cryptid.

Weird.

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Well yeah, by definition. If they share proof, it ceases to be a cryptid and simply becomes a discovery.