this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
735 points (88.4% liked)

Personal Finance

3819 readers
1 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
WandererLagomorph799@lemmy.ml
nieceandtows@programming.dev
nieceandtows@lemmy.ml
735
Landlords should have to pay income tax on their rental properties regardless of whether they're rented out or not. (gothamist.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de to c/personalfinance@lemmy.ml
376 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Commodifying things makes them cheap? As opposed to decommodifying? That makes no sense

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What is an example of decommodifying?

[–] Abraxiel@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Nationalized healthcare

[–] SamboT@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Making something unsuitable for investment so we preserve its primary function (houses being a home to a family and not an airbnb or an empty rental).