this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
326 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32318 readers
1013 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You sorta have to win the war to declare independence.

Change the question to: “would you die for Taiwanese independence?” And watch the numbers drop.

[–] diablexical@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sorta have to win the war to declare independence.

So mainland China is not independent then?

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They have the mainland and everyone recognizes them as China.

Sounds independent to me. Forget your pedantic nonsense.

[–] diablexical@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds independent to me. Forget your pedantic nonsense.

As does Taiwan to me, and right back at you comrade.

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So the “nation” that doesn’t even consider itself independent sounds independent to you?

And I’m the one being pedantic?

Sorry to say but independence isn’t a vibe.

It’s not a vibe based analysis.

[–] diablexical@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

that doesn’t even consider itself independent

How does it not consider itself independent?

[–] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the “nation” that doesn’t even consider itself independent sounds independent to you?

They cannot claim themselves independent or else China would attack. Don't you think it's kind of ludicrous that a country can force another "region" to not be independent by threatening them?

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What are your opinions on the civil war in the US?

Should the confederacy have been allowed to leave without threat of force?

[–] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I don't really care about the history of the US.

[–] randint@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@diablexical@lemm.ee was not actually claiming that China is not independent. They are trying prove that Taiwan is independent through reductio ad absurdium. Basically, they try to derive something absurd (in this case China not being independent) from your claims.

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thus “pedantic nonsense”

You can’t prove independence through logical contradiction. It’s a state of foreign recognition. China clearly won the war enough to be recognized. Taiwan did not.

Independence isn’t a vibe.

[–] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reductio ad absurdium is not "pedantic nonsense."

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When misapplied that badly, it really is.

[–] randint@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would anyone want to die for a mere label of "independence"? Most Taiwanese people just want to enjoy the practically independent status quo.

Because it’s not a vibe. They’re not really independent. The island will live forever in Chinas shadow.